elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Progressives Consulting Llc

vendor

LAS VEGAS, NV

6 committees paid them49 payments

Active cycles: 2024,2022,2020

Committees served / cycle

Revenue concentration

leverage · by revenue
45.7%
top client · Brand New Congress
75.3%
top 3 clients
100.0%
top 10 clients
Concentrated
the top 3 clients dominate this vendor's revenue
Brand New Congress 45.7%
Ashmi For Congress 22.6%
Brand New Congress 7.1%
Brand New Congress 9.6%
Vortex Pac 3.3%
E M Krause Committee To Elect 4 Nv 3.3%
Salem For Congress 2.1%
Committee To Elect Pam Keith 2.4%

Each client's share of this vendor's total revenue (disbursement dollars). The "captured vendor" signal — how dependent a vendor is on its largest clients.

Clients' race outcomes

not yet available

Race-by-race outcomes for this vendor's clients aren't shown yet -- they need election results data (by office, cycle, and stage) joined to the FEC/TEC candidates this vendor was paid by, which isn't wired into the warehouse yet. When it lands, this section will show three separate counts (by race, dollar-weighted, and competitive-races-only) for campaign-pay and independent-expenditure-pay separately -- never a single win rate, and never counted as a win for uncontested or write-in races.

CommitteePaidPaymentsCycles
Brand New Congress $19,340 25 2022
Ashmi For Congress $9,572 10 2022
Brand New Congress $2,990 4 2020
Brand New Congress $4,050 4 2024
Vortex Pac $1,410 1 2024
E M Krause Committee To Elect 4 Nv $1,400 1 2022
Salem For Congress $900 1 2024
Committee To Elect Pam Keith $1,000 1 2020
Ashmi For Congress $1,450 1 2024
E M Krause Committee To Elect 4 Nv $250 1 2024

Disbursements from each committee to this vendor.

Frequent collaborators

ranked by lift · vendors paid by the same committees
VendorShared committeesLift
Grassroots Analytics 3 57.7x
Google 4 10.0x
Ngp Van 3 9.0x
Actblue 3 8.9x

Other vendors this vendor's clients hire far more than base rate — lift = how many times more likely a client of this vendor is to also use that vendor, vs. all committees that paid an FEC vendor. Pairs sharing fewer than 3 committees are dropped (too little data for a reliable lift). Money-dark: shared-committee count and lift, not dollars.

Vendor disbursement recipient · corrected FEC disbursement data.