elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Beach, Emily

candidate · H2CA14188
Beach, Emily CA · DEM · House · CA-15 · open-seat
The seat — demographics, elections & money for this district full page ↗

Person: Beach, Emily · every race, every cycle

cycle 2022
1 cycles1 committees3 contributing committees38 vendors

Raised — contributing committees / cycle

Spent — vendor payments / cycle

IE support — independent expenditures for this candidate / cycle

Transferred out — other candidates funded / cycle

All four, combined -- 2016-2028

20162028
Raised Spent IE support Transferred out

2016–2028 · entity counts (money-dark); dollar trends light up at the flip. "Raised" is committee-routed contributions only — individual donors stay held pending the privacy decision, and there is no distinct bundler surface yet (#2488).

In this race

2022

DEM · primary contest (3 filers, order not yet known)

Candidate Status Cash on hand Contributing committees Raised / cycle Spent / cycle IE support / cycle Transferred / cycle
Beach, Emily (this candidate) open-seat 3
Canepa, David open-seat 1
Mullin, Kevin open-seat 163

REP

Candidate Status Cash on hand Contributing committees Raised / cycle Spent / cycle IE support / cycle Transferred / cycle
Mattammal, Gus open-seat

Every candidate on file for this race. A party with more than one filer is a live primary contest -- who becomes that party's nominee isn't in the data yet. Cash on hand is the official FEC filing figure, as of the filing's own coverage date -- not a live estimate. The remaining columns are money-dark proxies (counts, not dollars); a dash means no data on file for that candidate yet. Click a column heading to sort.

Campaign contact

BURLINGAME, CA, 94010

Website, phone and social accounts arrive with the campaign-contact ingest (FEC F1 + social sources).

Money raised vs spent

coming

Raised-vs-spent over time — the per-cycle totals surface is coming.

Where the money comes from

by source type

Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed) 97% · PACs 3%

Source typeContributionsAmount
Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed)770$330,251
PACs2$10,000
Total (committee-sourced)$340,251

Money received from committees, split by the type of the paying committee (PAC, Super PAC, party, joint-fundraising, conduit). Individual (person) giving is aggregated separately with privacy suppression and is not included here.

Individual-donor conduit dependency

lifetime

38% by dollars

722 of 1248 individual contributions on file routed through a conduit, lifetime -- not per-cycle (the underlying edge source can't be cleanly split by year). Conduit dollars are the true donor's money, passed through a platform; not double-counted.

PAC vs. individual money

by dollars

Individual (direct) 79% · Committee-routed (PAC / party / JFA / conduit) 21%

1248 individual contributions to this candidate's principal committee vs 772 committee-routed contributions across every committee this candidate has authorized ($1,259,352 vs $340,251). Two different grains -- individual money is scoped to the principal committee only; committee-routed money spans every authorized committee -- combined here as the closest count-first read of PAC- vs individual-dependence available today. Part of the funding-concentration strip (#2730); donor-sector concentration and top-vendor share are not yet available.

Where the money goes

beneficiaries

Money disbursed by this candidate's principal committee: contributions to other candidates (the "raises big, then funds allies" signal), transfers to committees by destination type, vendor spending, and independent expenditures made.

Where the donors are

precinct-floored · suppressed
Partial data. About 15% of donor money is geocoded, concentrated in 9 states (AK, AL, AR, AZ, CO, CT, DC, DE, FL). Every other state — including the largest donor states (CA, NY, TX) — currently has zero geocoded rows. A blank state means not yet geocoded, never no donors here. Not a complete picture of donor geography.
Loading…

Aggregated itemized individual giving, geocoded to donor home address, suppressed for privacy (small or single-donor-dominated cells withheld). Unitemized giving has no geography.

Who runs it

Treasurer · MILLER, RUSSELL H.

Board / senior staff arrive from the payroll-disbursement derivation.

Committees

authorized
CommitteeRoleType
Emily Beach For Congress Principal campaign committee H

Money in

committee & PAC contributions

Contributing committees & PACs · 2022:

Committee / PACContributedContributionsCycles
ActblueActBlue · conduit $330,251 770 2022
With Honor Pac $5,000 1 2022
International Brotherhood Of Electrical Workers Political Action Committee $5,000 1 2022

Committee & PAC contributions to this candidate. Individual donors remain held (donor-privacy decision).

Conduit dependency

via ActBlue / WinRed

100% of committee-routed contributions to this candidate (2022) arrive through conduit infrastructure — 770 of 772 contributions · 97% of dollars ($330,251).

ConduitAmount
ActBlue$330,251

Conduits (ActBlue, WinRed) are passthroughs — individuals give through them to candidates. This is the share of committee-routed contributions flowing over that infrastructure. Donor-level pass-through to the ultimate recipient is tracked separately (in progress).

Cross-party support

who funds both sides

1 of this candidate's 3 top committee funders also fund the other side.

Committee / PACOverall givingD / R
With Honor Pac 56% / 44%

Each committee's overall giving split by recipient party (by dollars).

Super PAC spending

outside money

Supporting: 2 committees · 4 expenditures · $166,185  ·  Opposing: 0 · 0 · —

CommitteeStanceAmount
With Honor Fund, Inc. supports $112,982
Votevets supports $53,203

Independent expenditures for or against this candidate. 2016 excluded (known IE undercount).

33% of this candidate's receipts + outside spending is outside money (independent expenditures for/against, as a share of receipts plus outside spending).

Money out — top vendors

$ shown
VendorPaidPaymentsCategory
Actblue $13,050 34 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Kully Hall Llc $116,392 28 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Miller & Olson, Llp $27,061 9 001 (Administrative / overhead)
River City Business Services $6,233 8 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Ngp Van $6,400 7 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Bedford Grove $22,500 5 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Screen Strategies $135,460 4 004 (Advertising)
Hirth, Deborah $390 4 003 (Fundraising & solicitation)
Comstock, Andrew $12,000 3 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Rtbiq Inc. $33,000 3 004 (Advertising)
Silverspot Graphics $5,941 3 006 (Campaign materials)
Emc Research, Inc. $43,000 2 005 (Polling)

Payment counts from the principal committee; dollar totals held. Arc maps of where money goes arrive with the geo layer.

Top expenditure categories

$ held
CategoryPayments
001 (Administrative / overhead)104
004 (Advertising)37
003 (Fundraising & solicitation)36
007 (Campaign events)28
006 (Campaign materials)3
005 (Polling)2

Disbursement categories by payment count; dollar rollups held.

Right of response

No response on file. The subject of this page may add a statement here.

Is this you? Claim this page to respond. Statements are the subject's own words, verified and moderated — the underlying data is unchanged.

One-stop candidate summary · money-dark until the corrected-financial refresh. Data as of March 11, 2026, 11 a.m..