elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Arrington, Katherine Elizabeth

candidate · H8SC01124
Arrington, Katherine Elizabeth SC · REP · House · SC-01 · challenger
The seat — demographics, elections & money for this district full page ↗

Person: Arrington, Katherine Elizabeth · every race, every cycle

cycle 202220202018
3 cycles1 committees0 contributing committees19 vendors

Raised — contributing committees / cycle

Spent — vendor payments / cycle

IE support — independent expenditures for this candidate / cycle

Transferred out — other candidates funded / cycle

All four, combined -- 2016-2028

20162028
Raised Spent IE support Transferred out

2016–2028 · entity counts (money-dark); dollar trends light up at the flip. "Raised" is committee-routed contributions only — individual donors stay held pending the privacy decision, and there is no distinct bundler surface yet (#2488).

In this race

2022

DEM · primary contest (2 filers, order not yet known)

Candidate Status Cash on hand Contributing committees Raised / cycle Spent / cycle IE support / cycle Transferred / cycle
Andrews, Annie Dr. challenger 3
Cingolani, Rebecca Niess challenger 1

REP · primary contest (5 filers, order not yet known)

Candidate Status Cash on hand Contributing committees Raised / cycle Spent / cycle IE support / cycle Transferred / cycle
Arrington, Katherine Elizabeth (this candidate) challenger 97
Arrington, Katie challenger
Centurion, Ingrid challenger
MacE, Nancy incumbent 397
Piper-Loomis, Lynz challenger

Every candidate on file for this race. A party with more than one filer is a live primary contest -- who becomes that party's nominee isn't in the data yet. Cash on hand is the official FEC filing figure, as of the filing's own coverage date -- not a live estimate. The remaining columns are money-dark proxies (counts, not dollars); a dash means no data on file for that candidate yet. Click a column heading to sort.

Campaign contact

SUMMERVILLE, SC, 294835954

Website, phone and social accounts arrive with the campaign-contact ingest (FEC F1 + social sources).

Money raised vs spent

coming

Raised-vs-spent over time — the per-cycle totals surface is coming.

Where the money comes from

by source type

PACs 100% · Super PACs 0%

Source typeContributionsAmount
PACs115$248,500
Super PACs1$500
Total (committee-sourced)$249,000

Money received from committees, split by the type of the paying committee (PAC, Super PAC, party, joint-fundraising, conduit). Individual (person) giving is aggregated separately with privacy suppression and is not included here.

Individual-donor conduit dependency

lifetime

0% by dollars

0 of 1794 individual contributions on file routed through a conduit, lifetime -- not per-cycle (the underlying edge source can't be cleanly split by year). Conduit dollars are the true donor's money, passed through a platform; not double-counted.

PAC vs. individual money

by dollars

Individual (direct) 86% · Committee-routed (PAC / party / JFA / conduit) 14%

1794 individual contributions to this candidate's principal committee vs 116 committee-routed contributions across every committee this candidate has authorized ($1,584,670 vs $249,000). Two different grains -- individual money is scoped to the principal committee only; committee-routed money spans every authorized committee -- combined here as the closest count-first read of PAC- vs individual-dependence available today. Part of the funding-concentration strip (#2730); donor-sector concentration and top-vendor share are not yet available.

Where the money goes

beneficiaries

Money disbursed by this candidate's principal committee: contributions to other candidates (the "raises big, then funds allies" signal), transfers to committees by destination type, vendor spending, and independent expenditures made.

Where the donors are

precinct-floored · suppressed
Partial data. About 15% of donor money is geocoded, concentrated in 9 states (AK, AL, AR, AZ, CO, CT, DC, DE, FL). Every other state — including the largest donor states (CA, NY, TX) — currently has zero geocoded rows. A blank state means not yet geocoded, never no donors here. Not a complete picture of donor geography.
Loading…

Aggregated itemized individual giving, geocoded to donor home address, suppressed for privacy (small or single-donor-dominated cells withheld). Unitemized giving has no geography.

Who runs it

Treasurer · RANDALL, KATHLEEN

Board / senior staff arrive from the payroll-disbursement derivation.

Committees

authorized
CommitteeRoleType
Katie Arrington For Congress Principal campaign committee H

Money in

committee & PAC contributions

Contributing committees & PACs · 2022:

No committee contributions on file for this cycle.

Cross-party support

who funds both sides

24 of this candidate's 40 top committee funders also fund the other side.

Committee / PACOverall givingD / R
National Association Of Realtors Political Action Committee 50% / 50%
American Association Of Nurse Anesthetists Separate Segregated Fund (Crna-Pac) 48% / 52%
American Physical Therapy Association Physical Therapy Political Action Committee (Pt-Pac) 53% / 47%
American Council Of Engineering Companies (Acec/Pac) 46% / 54%
American Crystal Sugar Company Political Action Committee 54% / 46%
American Optometric Association Political Action Committee 46% / 54%
American Podiatric Medical Association Political Action Committee 54% / 46%
At&T Inc. Employee Federal Political Action Committee (At&T Employee Federal Pac) 45% / 55%
Comcast Corporation & Nbcuniversal Political Action Committee - Federal 45% / 55%
Kpmg Partners/Principals And Employees Pac 45% / 55%
American Hospital Association Pac 57% / 43%
General Dynamics Corporation Political Action Committee (General Dynamics Employee Pac) 41% / 59%

Each committee's overall giving split by recipient party (by dollars).

Super PAC spending

outside money

Supporting: 0 committees · 0 expenditures · —  ·  Opposing: 1 · 2 · $245,000

CommitteeStanceAmount
Value In Electing Women Political Action Committee opposes $245,000

Independent expenditures for or against this candidate. 2016 excluded (known IE undercount).

50% of this candidate's receipts + outside spending is outside money (independent expenditures for/against, as a share of receipts plus outside spending).

Money out — top vendors

$ shown
VendorPaidPaymentsCategory
Anedot $20,368 47 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Wells Fargo $986 28 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Creative Communications $490,856 14 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Right Voter, Llc $51,139 11 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Woco Digital $34,091 10 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Upt Strategies $264,136 10 001 (Administrative / overhead)
9Seven Consulting $21,018 9 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Wpai $81,500 3 005 (Polling)
The Prosper Group Corporation $84,475 3 001 (Administrative / overhead)
The Theodore Company $32,517 2 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Holtzman, Vogel, Josefiak, Pllc $5,000 1 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Maine Aviation Aircraft Charter, Llc $12,363 1 002 (Travel)

Payment counts from the principal committee; dollar totals held. Arc maps of where money goes arrive with the geo layer.

Top expenditure categories

$ held
CategoryPayments
001 (Administrative / overhead)141
004 (Advertising)14
005 (Polling)3
002 (Travel)2

Disbursement categories by payment count; dollar rollups held.

Right of response

No response on file. The subject of this page may add a statement here.

Is this you? Claim this page to respond. Statements are the subject's own words, verified and moderated — the underlying data is unchanged.

One-stop candidate summary · money-dark until the corrected-financial refresh. Data as of March 11, 2026, 11 a.m..