elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Scott, Timothy E.

candidate · S4SC00240
Scott, Timothy E. SC · REP · Senate · SC · incumbent
The seat — demographics, elections & money for this district full page ↗

Person: Scott, Timothy E. · every race, every cycle

8 cycles3 committees57 contributing committees1016 vendors

Raised — contributing committees / cycle

Spent — vendor payments / cycle

IE support — independent expenditures for this candidate / cycle

Transferred out — other candidates funded / cycle

All four, combined -- 2016-2028

20162028
Raised Spent IE support Transferred out

2016–2028 · entity counts (money-dark); dollar trends light up at the flip. "Raised" is committee-routed contributions only — individual donors stay held pending the privacy decision, and there is no distinct bundler surface yet (#2488).

In this race

2026

DEM

Candidate Status Cash on hand Contributing committees Raised / cycle Spent / cycle IE support / cycle Transferred / cycle
Freeman, Kyle Odonnell challenger 1

REP · primary contest (2 filers, order not yet known)

Candidate Status Cash on hand Contributing committees Raised / cycle Spent / cycle IE support / cycle Transferred / cycle
Scott, Timothy E. (this candidate) incumbent 758
Graham, Lindsey O. incumbent 519

Every candidate on file for this race. A party with more than one filer is a live primary contest -- who becomes that party's nominee isn't in the data yet. Cash on hand is the official FEC filing figure, as of the filing's own coverage date -- not a live estimate. The remaining columns are money-dark proxies (counts, not dollars); a dash means no data on file for that candidate yet. Click a column heading to sort.

In the 2026 Senate field

SC

117 Senate candidates nationally in 2026.

#CandidateStatePartyRaised
1 Ossoff, T. Jonathan GA DEM $214,842,226
2 Sullivan, Dan AK REP $109,507,676
3 Graham, Lindsey O. SC REP $55,788,928
4 Peters, Gary MI DEM $42,624,020
5 McConnell, Mitch KY REP $41,405,744
6 Hickenlooper, John W. CO DEM $40,916,604
7 Daines, Steve MT REP $23,656,650
8 Booker, Cory A. NJ DEM $22,038,180

The national Senate field for 2026, ranked by money raised. Party affiliation shown as filed — third-party and state-party labels (DFL, WFP, etc.) are not merged into DEM/REP. This candidate did not appear in the returned set.

Campaign contact

NORTH CHARLESTON, SC, 29406

Website, phone and social accounts arrive with the campaign-contact ingest (FEC F1 + social sources).

Money raised vs spent

coming

Raised-vs-spent over time — the per-cycle totals surface is coming.

Where the money comes from

by source type

Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed) 61% · PACs 39% · Super PACs 1%

Source typeContributionsAmount
Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed)199468$6,981,329
PACs2504$4,468,747
Super PACs30$63,043
Total (committee-sourced)$11,513,120

Money received from committees, split by the type of the paying committee (PAC, Super PAC, party, joint-fundraising, conduit). Individual (person) giving is aggregated separately with privacy suppression and is not included here.

Transfers in

from committees
Payer typeTransfersAmount
Joint-fundraising committees55$2,174,197
PACs2$3,000
Total$2,177,197

Committee-to-committee transfers received by this candidate's principal committee, split by the type of the sending committee.

Individual-donor conduit dependency

lifetime

51% by dollars

827034 of 923529 individual contributions on file routed through a conduit, lifetime -- not per-cycle (the underlying edge source can't be cleanly split by year). Conduit dollars are the true donor's money, passed through a platform; not double-counted.

PAC vs. individual money

by dollars

Individual (direct) 89% · Committee-routed (PAC / party / JFA / conduit) 11%

923529 individual contributions to this candidate's principal committee vs 202002 committee-routed contributions across every committee this candidate has authorized ($90,926,282 vs $11,513,120). Two different grains -- individual money is scoped to the principal committee only; committee-routed money spans every authorized committee -- combined here as the closest count-first read of PAC- vs individual-dependence available today. Part of the funding-concentration strip (#2730); donor-sector concentration and top-vendor share are not yet available.

Where the money goes

beneficiaries

Money disbursed by this candidate's principal committee: contributions to other candidates (the "raises big, then funds allies" signal), transfers to committees by destination type, vendor spending, and independent expenditures made.

Where the donors are

precinct-floored · suppressed
Partial data. About 15% of donor money is geocoded, concentrated in 9 states (AK, AL, AR, AZ, CO, CT, DC, DE, FL). Every other state — including the largest donor states (CA, NY, TX) — currently has zero geocoded rows. A blank state means not yet geocoded, never no donors here. Not a complete picture of donor geography.
Loading…

Aggregated itemized individual giving, geocoded to donor home address, suppressed for privacy (small or single-donor-dominated cells withheld). Unitemized giving has no geography.

Who runs it

Treasurer · WIGGINS, STACY E

Board / senior staff arrive from the payroll-disbursement derivation.

Committees

authorized
CommitteeRoleType
Mississippi Majority Committee Joint fundraising N
Scott Capito Rounds Victory Fund Joint fundraising S
Tim Scott For America Principal campaign committee S

Money in

committee & PAC contributions

Contributing committees & PACs · 2026:

No committee contributions on file for this cycle.

Cross-party support

who funds both sides

34 of this candidate's 40 top committee funders also fund the other side.

Committee / PACOverall givingD / R
American Council Of Life Insurers Political Action Committee 50% / 50%
Medtronic Inc. Pac 50% / 50%
National Confectioners Association Of The United States, Inc. Political Action Committee (Candy Pac) 50% / 50%
America'S Credit Unions Pac Of Credit Union National Association, Inc. 51% / 49%
Elevance Health, Inc. Political Action Committee (Elevance Health Pac) 51% / 49%
Huntington Ingalls Industries, Inc. Employees Political Action Committee (Hiipac) 49% / 51%
Pricewaterhousecoopers Political Action Committee I 49% / 51%
Teachers Insurance Annuity Association Of America Pac (Tiaa Pac) 51% / 49%
The Vanguard Group Committee For Responsible Government 49% / 51%
Deloitte Political Action Committee 48% / 52%
The Guardian Life Insurance Company Of America Political Action Committee - Federal (Guardian Life P 52% / 48%
The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company Political Action Committee (Nmpac) 48% / 52%

Each committee's overall giving split by recipient party (by dollars).

Super PAC spending

$ held · counts

No independent expenditures on file for 2026 (2016 excluded).

Money out — top vendors

$ shown
VendorPaidPaymentsCategory
Winred $1,063,512 497 003 (Fundraising & solicitation)
Winred Technical Services Llc $264,015 289
Stripe $4,670 276 003 (Fundraising & solicitation)
Winred Online $178,660 257 003 (Fundraising & solicitation)
Adp $456,365 196 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Stripe $145 140 003 (Fundraising & solicitation)
Insperity $180,464 129
American Airlines $86,388 126 002 (Travel)
Amazon $12,572 123 001 (Administrative / overhead)
American Airlines $48,209 120 002 (Travel)
Stripe $117 112 003 (Fundraising & solicitation)
Atandt $3,675 105 001 (Administrative / overhead)

Payment counts from the principal committee; dollar totals held. Arc maps of where money goes arrive with the geo layer.

Top expenditure categories

$ held
CategoryPayments
001 (Administrative / overhead)3,393
003 (Fundraising & solicitation)2,197
002 (Travel)1,052
007 (Campaign events)317
006 (Campaign materials)313
004 (Advertising)120
012 (Donations)22
005 (Polling)21
011 (Political contributions)10

Disbursement categories by payment count; dollar rollups held.

Right of response

No response on file. The subject of this page may add a statement here.

Is this you? Claim this page to respond. Statements are the subject's own words, verified and moderated — the underlying data is unchanged.

One-stop candidate summary · money-dark until the corrected-financial refresh. Data as of March 11, 2026, 11 a.m..