elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Cookingham, Kevin

candidate · H0CA16120
Cookingham, Kevin CA · REP · House · CA-16 · challenger
The seat — demographics, elections & money for this district full page ↗

Person: Cookingham, Kevin · every race, every cycle

cycle 20222020
2 cycles1 committees5 contributing committees36 vendors

Raised — contributing committees / cycle

Spent — vendor payments / cycle

IE support — independent expenditures for this candidate / cycle

Transferred out — other candidates funded / cycle

All four, combined -- 2016-2028

20162028
Raised Spent IE support Transferred out

2016–2028 · entity counts (money-dark); dollar trends light up at the flip. "Raised" is committee-routed contributions only — individual donors stay held pending the privacy decision, and there is no distinct bundler surface yet (#2488).

In this race

2020

DEM · primary contest (3 filers, order not yet known)

Candidate Status Cash on hand Contributing committees Raised / cycle Spent / cycle IE support / cycle Transferred / cycle
Costa, Jim incumbent 392
Soria, Esmeralda challenger 6
Williams, Kim challenger 3

REP

Candidate Status Cash on hand Contributing committees Raised / cycle Spent / cycle IE support / cycle Transferred / cycle
Cookingham, Kevin (this candidate) challenger 5

Every candidate on file for this race. A party with more than one filer is a live primary contest -- who becomes that party's nominee isn't in the data yet. Cash on hand is the official FEC filing figure, as of the filing's own coverage date -- not a live estimate. The remaining columns are money-dark proxies (counts, not dollars); a dash means no data on file for that candidate yet. Click a column heading to sort.

Campaign contact

CLOVIS, CA, 93619

Website, phone and social accounts arrive with the campaign-contact ingest (FEC F1 + social sources).

Money raised vs spent

coming

Raised-vs-spent over time — the per-cycle totals surface is coming.

Where the money comes from

by source type

Party committees 40% · PACs 32% · Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed) 28%

Source typeContributionsAmount
Party committees3$7,500
PACs2$6,000
Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed)100$5,286
Total (committee-sourced)$18,786

Money received from committees, split by the type of the paying committee (PAC, Super PAC, party, joint-fundraising, conduit). Individual (person) giving is aggregated separately with privacy suppression and is not included here.

Individual-donor conduit dependency

lifetime

2% by dollars

48 of 612 individual contributions on file routed through a conduit, lifetime -- not per-cycle (the underlying edge source can't be cleanly split by year). Conduit dollars are the true donor's money, passed through a platform; not double-counted.

PAC vs. individual money

by dollars

Individual (direct) 96% · Committee-routed (PAC / party / JFA / conduit) 4%

612 individual contributions to this candidate's principal committee vs 105 committee-routed contributions across every committee this candidate has authorized ($451,254 vs $18,786). Two different grains -- individual money is scoped to the principal committee only; committee-routed money spans every authorized committee -- combined here as the closest count-first read of PAC- vs individual-dependence available today. Part of the funding-concentration strip (#2730); donor-sector concentration and top-vendor share are not yet available.

Where the money goes

beneficiaries

Money disbursed by this candidate's principal committee: contributions to other candidates (the "raises big, then funds allies" signal), transfers to committees by destination type, vendor spending, and independent expenditures made.

Where the donors are

precinct-floored · suppressed
Partial data. About 15% of donor money is geocoded, concentrated in 9 states (AK, AL, AR, AZ, CO, CT, DC, DE, FL). Every other state — including the largest donor states (CA, NY, TX) — currently has zero geocoded rows. A blank state means not yet geocoded, never no donors here. Not a complete picture of donor geography.
Loading…

Aggregated itemized individual giving, geocoded to donor home address, suppressed for privacy (small or single-donor-dominated cells withheld). Unitemized giving has no geography.

Who runs it

Treasurer · SLATER, JEN

Board / senior staff arrive from the payroll-disbursement derivation.

Committees

authorized
CommitteeRoleType
Cookingham For Congress Principal campaign committee H

Money in

committee & PAC contributions

Contributing committees & PACs · 2020:

Committee / PACContributedContributionsCycles
WinredWinRed · conduit $5,286 100 2020
Republican Party Of Madera County (Fed.) $4,400 2 2020
Allied Grape Growers Pac $1,000 1 2020
Huck Pac $5,000 1 2020
Republican Party Of Fresno County $3,100 1 2020

Committee & PAC contributions to this candidate. Individual donors remain held (donor-privacy decision).

Conduit dependency

via ActBlue / WinRed

95% of committee-routed contributions to this candidate (2020) arrive through conduit infrastructure — 100 of 105 contributions · 28% of dollars ($5,286).

ConduitAmount
WinRed$5,286

Conduits (ActBlue, WinRed) are passthroughs — individuals give through them to candidates. This is the share of committee-routed contributions flowing over that infrastructure. Donor-level pass-through to the ultimate recipient is tracked separately (in progress).

Cross-party support

who funds both sides

1 of this candidate's 5 top committee funders also fund the other side.

Committee / PACOverall givingD / R
Allied Grape Growers Pac 22% / 78%

Each committee's overall giving split by recipient party (by dollars).

Super PAC spending

outside money

Supporting: 2 committees · 2 expenditures · $8,696  ·  Opposing: 1 · 2 · $60

CommitteeStanceAmount
Planned Parenthood Votes opposes $60
Cooperative Of American Physicians Independent Expenditure Committee supports $7,996
Republican Party Of Fresno County supports $700

Independent expenditures for or against this candidate. 2016 excluded (known IE undercount).

32% of this candidate's receipts + outside spending is outside money (independent expenditures for/against, as a share of receipts plus outside spending).

Money out — top vendors

$ shown
VendorPaidPaymentsCategory
Capital Tech Solutions $6,652 27 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Cookingham - Personal Funds, Kevin $38,856 23 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Campaign Compliance Group $23,354 17 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Bct Consulting Inc $9,090 9 004 (Advertising)
American Express $11,441 9 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Bank Of America $228 9 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Better Deal Printing $15,858 7 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Kfsn - Tv $30,998 6 004 (Advertising)
Contreras, Noah $2,850 5 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Para Bellum Public Affairs $6,279 4 004 (Advertising)
The Ranchos Independent $622 3 004 (Advertising)
X Strategies $9,000 3 004 (Advertising)

Payment counts from the principal committee; dollar totals held. Arc maps of where money goes arrive with the geo layer.

Top expenditure categories

$ held
CategoryPayments
001 (Administrative / overhead)109
004 (Advertising)79
003 (Fundraising & solicitation)36
007 (Campaign events)1

Disbursement categories by payment count; dollar rollups held.

Right of response

No response on file. The subject of this page may add a statement here.

Is this you? Claim this page to respond. Statements are the subject's own words, verified and moderated — the underlying data is unchanged.

One-stop candidate summary · money-dark until the corrected-financial refresh. Data as of March 11, 2026, 11 a.m..