elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Young, David

candidate · H4IA03115
Young, David IA · REP · House · IA-03 · challenger
The seat — demographics, elections & money for this district full page ↗

Person: Young, David · every race, every cycle

6 cycles2 committees0 contributing committees201 vendors

Raised — contributing committees / cycle

Spent — vendor payments / cycle

IE support — independent expenditures for this candidate / cycle

Transferred out — other candidates funded / cycle

All four, combined -- 2016-2028

20162028
Raised Spent IE support Transferred out

2016–2028 · entity counts (money-dark); dollar trends light up at the flip. "Raised" is committee-routed contributions only — individual donors stay held pending the privacy decision, and there is no distinct bundler surface yet (#2488).

In this race

2014

DEM · primary contest (2 filers, order not yet known)

Candidate Status Cash on hand Contributing committees Raised / cycle Spent / cycle IE support / cycle Transferred / cycle
Appel, Staci open-seat
Sherzan, Michael Thomas open-seat

REP · primary contest (7 filers, order not yet known)

Candidate Status Cash on hand Contributing committees Raised / cycle Spent / cycle IE support / cycle Transferred / cycle
Young, David (this candidate) challenger 353
Cramer, Robert James open-seat 2
Latham, Thomas challenger
Schultz, Matthew David open-seat
Shaw, Monte open-seat
Young, David open-seat 35
Zaun, Brad open-seat

LIB

Candidate Status Cash on hand Contributing committees Raised / cycle Spent / cycle IE support / cycle Transferred / cycle
Wright, Edward Benedict open-seat

Every candidate on file for this race. A party with more than one filer is a live primary contest -- who becomes that party's nominee isn't in the data yet. Cash on hand is the official FEC filing figure, as of the filing's own coverage date -- not a live estimate. The remaining columns are money-dark proxies (counts, not dollars); a dash means no data on file for that candidate yet. Click a column heading to sort.

Campaign contact

VAN METER, GA, 50261

Website, phone and social accounts arrive with the campaign-contact ingest (FEC F1 + social sources).

Money raised vs spent

coming

Raised-vs-spent over time — the per-cycle totals surface is coming.

Where the money comes from

by source type

PACs 72% · Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed) 27% · Super PACs 1% · Party committees 0%

Source typeContributionsAmount
PACs767$1,511,899
Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed)13980$563,775
Super PACs8$23,500
Party committees1$5,000
Total (committee-sourced)$2,104,174

Money received from committees, split by the type of the paying committee (PAC, Super PAC, party, joint-fundraising, conduit). Individual (person) giving is aggregated separately with privacy suppression and is not included here.

Transfers in

from committees
Payer typeTransfersAmount
Joint-fundraising committees16$253,618
PACs2$3,500
Total$257,118

Committee-to-committee transfers received by this candidate's principal committee, split by the type of the sending committee.

Individual-donor conduit dependency

lifetime

15% by dollars

3148 of 13094 individual contributions on file routed through a conduit, lifetime -- not per-cycle (the underlying edge source can't be cleanly split by year). Conduit dollars are the true donor's money, passed through a platform; not double-counted.

PAC vs. individual money

by dollars

Individual (direct) 81% · Committee-routed (PAC / party / JFA / conduit) 19%

13094 individual contributions to this candidate's principal committee vs 14756 committee-routed contributions across every committee this candidate has authorized ($9,033,736 vs $2,104,174). Two different grains -- individual money is scoped to the principal committee only; committee-routed money spans every authorized committee -- combined here as the closest count-first read of PAC- vs individual-dependence available today. Part of the funding-concentration strip (#2730); donor-sector concentration and top-vendor share are not yet available.

Where the money goes

beneficiaries

Money disbursed by this candidate's principal committee: contributions to other candidates (the "raises big, then funds allies" signal), transfers to committees by destination type, vendor spending, and independent expenditures made.

Where the donors are

precinct-floored · suppressed
Partial data. About 15% of donor money is geocoded, concentrated in 9 states (AK, AL, AR, AZ, CO, CT, DC, DE, FL). Every other state — including the largest donor states (CA, NY, TX) — currently has zero geocoded rows. A blank state means not yet geocoded, never no donors here. Not a complete picture of donor geography.
Loading…

Aggregated itemized individual giving, geocoded to donor home address, suppressed for privacy (small or single-donor-dominated cells withheld). Unitemized giving has no geography.

Who runs it

Treasurer · KILGORE, PAUL

Board / senior staff arrive from the payroll-disbursement derivation.

Committees

authorized
CommitteeRoleType
Young For Ia-03 Authorized committee H
Yfi Pac Unauthorized / leadership PAC H

Money in

committee & PAC contributions

Contributing committees & PACs · 2014:

No committee contributions on file for this cycle.

Cross-party support

who funds both sides

30 of this candidate's 40 top committee funders also fund the other side.

Committee / PACOverall givingD / R
National Association Of Realtors Political Action Committee 50% / 50%
Employees Of Northrop Grumman Corporation Pac 49% / 51%
American Veterinary Medical Association Political Action Committee 48% / 52%
Transamerica Corporation Pac 48% / 52%
General Mills, Inc. Political Action Committee 46% / 54%
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company Financial & Investments Political Action Committee 46% / 54%
Principal Life Insurance Company Political Action Committee 45% / 55%
Target Corporation Citizens Political Forum (Targetcitizens Political Forum) 45% / 55%
Walmart Inc. Pac For Responsible Government 45% / 55%
Raytheon Technologies Corporation Pac (Formerly Utc Pac) 44% / 56%
Lockheed Martin Corporation Employees' Political Action Committee 43% / 57%
Wells Fargo And Company Employee Pac (Aka Wells Fargo Employee Pac) 43% / 57%

Each committee's overall giving split by recipient party (by dollars).

Super PAC spending

$ held · counts

No independent expenditures on file for 2014 (2016 excluded).

Money out — top vendors

$ shown
VendorPaidPaymentsCategory
Stripe $3,742 74 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Anedot $10,596 66
Anedot $2,643 42
Swanson, Andy $61,088 33
Gusto $60,621 32
Global Marketing $22,265 27 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Young, Grant $41,976 27
Google $2,076 24
Professional Data Services $13,067 21
Mailchimp $3,150 21
Red Rock Strategies $313,181 21 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Hayes, Anna $24,215 21

Payment counts from the principal committee; dollar totals held. Arc maps of where money goes arrive with the geo layer.

Top expenditure categories

$ held
CategoryPayments
001 (Administrative / overhead)175

Disbursement categories by payment count; dollar rollups held.

Right of response

No response on file. The subject of this page may add a statement here.

Is this you? Claim this page to respond. Statements are the subject's own words, verified and moderated — the underlying data is unchanged.

One-stop candidate summary · money-dark until the corrected-financial refresh. Data as of March 11, 2026, 11 a.m..