elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

London, Cathleen Greenberg Dr

candidate · S0ME00053
London, Cathleen Greenberg Dr ME · DEM · Senate · ME · challenger
The seat — demographics, elections & money for this district full page ↗

Person: London, Cathleen Greenberg Dr · every race, every cycle

4 cycles1 committees0 contributing committees0 vendors

Raised — contributing committees / cycle

Spent — vendor payments / cycle

IE support — independent expenditures for this candidate / cycle

Transferred out — other candidates funded / cycle

All four, combined -- 2016-2028

20162028
Raised Spent IE support Transferred out

2016–2028 · entity counts (money-dark); dollar trends light up at the flip. "Raised" is committee-routed contributions only — individual donors stay held pending the privacy decision, and there is no distinct bundler surface yet (#2488).

In the 2022 Senate field

ME

748 Senate candidates nationally in 2022.

#CandidateStatePartyRaised
1 Warnock, Raphael GA DEM $215,222,453
2 Kelly, Mark AZ DEM $187,045,474
3 Fetterman, John Karl PA DEM $60,730,598
4 Cortez Masto, Catherine NV DEM $59,540,356
5 Ryan, Timothy OH DEM $44,196,849
6 Barnes, Mandela WI DEM $36,011,252
7 Hassan, Margaret Wood NH DEM $35,587,066
8 Beasley, Cheri NC DEM $27,632,915

The national Senate field for 2022, ranked by money raised. Party affiliation shown as filed — third-party and state-party labels (DFL, WFP, etc.) are not merged into DEM/REP. This candidate did not appear in the returned set.

Campaign contact

MILBRIDGE, ME, 04658

Website, phone and social accounts arrive with the campaign-contact ingest (FEC F1 + social sources).

Money raised vs spent

coming

Raised-vs-spent over time — the per-cycle totals surface is coming.

Where the money comes from

by source type

Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed) 100%

Source typeContributionsAmount
Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed)1441$57,540
Total (committee-sourced)$57,540

Money received from committees, split by the type of the paying committee (PAC, Super PAC, party, joint-fundraising, conduit). Individual (person) giving is aggregated separately with privacy suppression and is not included here.

Individual-donor conduit dependency

lifetime

100% by dollars

52 of 54 individual contributions on file routed through a conduit, lifetime -- not per-cycle (the underlying edge source can't be cleanly split by year). Conduit dollars are the true donor's money, passed through a platform; not double-counted.

PAC vs. individual money

by dollars

Individual (direct) 36% · Committee-routed (PAC / party / JFA / conduit) 64%

54 individual contributions to this candidate's principal committee vs 1441 committee-routed contributions across every committee this candidate has authorized ($31,846 vs $57,540). Two different grains -- individual money is scoped to the principal committee only; committee-routed money spans every authorized committee -- combined here as the closest count-first read of PAC- vs individual-dependence available today. Part of the funding-concentration strip (#2730); donor-sector concentration and top-vendor share are not yet available.

Where the donors are

precinct-floored · suppressed
Partial data. About 15% of donor money is geocoded, concentrated in 9 states (AK, AL, AR, AZ, CO, CT, DC, DE, FL). Every other state — including the largest donor states (CA, NY, TX) — currently has zero geocoded rows. A blank state means not yet geocoded, never no donors here. Not a complete picture of donor geography.
Loading…

Aggregated itemized individual giving, geocoded to donor home address, suppressed for privacy (small or single-donor-dominated cells withheld). Unitemized giving has no geography.

Who runs it

Treasurer · PRATT, ANDREW

Board / senior staff arrive from the payroll-disbursement derivation.

Committees

authorized
CommitteeRoleType
Dr Cat London For Us Senate Principal campaign committee S

Money in

committee & PAC contributions

Contributing committees & PACs · 2022:

No committee contributions on file for this cycle.

Super PAC spending

$ held · counts

No independent expenditures on file for 2022 (2016 excluded).

Money out — top vendors

$ shown

No vendor disbursements on file.

Right of response

No response on file. The subject of this page may add a statement here.

Is this you? Claim this page to respond. Statements are the subject's own words, verified and moderated — the underlying data is unchanged.

One-stop candidate summary · money-dark until the corrected-financial refresh. Data as of March 11, 2026, 11 a.m..