elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Walberg, Timothy L Rep

candidate · H4MI07103
Walberg, Timothy L Rep MI · REP · House · MI-05 · incumbent
The seat — demographics, elections & money for this district full page ↗

Person: Walberg, Timothy L Rep · every race, every cycle

12 cycles4 committees0 contributing committees394 vendors

Raised — contributing committees / cycle

Spent — vendor payments / cycle

IE support — independent expenditures for this candidate / cycle

Transferred out — other candidates funded / cycle

All four, combined -- 2016-2028

20162028
Raised Spent IE support Transferred out

2016–2028 · entity counts (money-dark); dollar trends light up at the flip. "Raised" is committee-routed contributions only — individual donors stay held pending the privacy decision, and there is no distinct bundler surface yet (#2488).

In this race

2008

DEM

Candidate Status Cash on hand Contributing committees Raised / cycle Spent / cycle IE support / cycle Transferred / cycle
Kildee, Dale incumbent 17

REP

Candidate Status Cash on hand Contributing committees Raised / cycle Spent / cycle IE support / cycle Transferred / cycle
Walberg, Timothy L Rep (this candidate) incumbent 434

Every candidate on file for this race. A party with more than one filer is a live primary contest -- who becomes that party's nominee isn't in the data yet. Cash on hand is the official FEC filing figure, as of the filing's own coverage date -- not a live estimate. The remaining columns are money-dark proxies (counts, not dollars); a dash means no data on file for that candidate yet. Click a column heading to sort.

Campaign contact

TIPTON, MI, 492879807

Website, phone and social accounts arrive with the campaign-contact ingest (FEC F1 + social sources).

Money raised vs spent

coming

Raised-vs-spent over time — the per-cycle totals surface is coming.

Where the money comes from

by source type

PACs 91% · Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed) 9% · Super PACs 1% · Party committees 0%

Source typeContributionsAmount
PACs1587$2,756,917
Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed)6779$263,004
Super PACs12$21,500
Party committees2$1,228
Total (committee-sourced)$3,042,649

Money received from committees, split by the type of the paying committee (PAC, Super PAC, party, joint-fundraising, conduit). Individual (person) giving is aggregated separately with privacy suppression and is not included here.

Transfers in

from committees
Payer typeTransfersAmount
Joint-fundraising committees16$145,098
Total$145,098

Committee-to-committee transfers received by this candidate's principal committee, split by the type of the sending committee.

Individual-donor conduit dependency

lifetime

19% by dollars

6570 of 27164 individual contributions on file routed through a conduit, lifetime -- not per-cycle (the underlying edge source can't be cleanly split by year). Conduit dollars are the true donor's money, passed through a platform; not double-counted.

PAC vs. individual money

by dollars

Individual (direct) 85% · Committee-routed (PAC / party / JFA / conduit) 15%

27164 individual contributions to this candidate's principal committee vs 8380 committee-routed contributions across every committee this candidate has authorized ($16,628,832 vs $3,042,649). Two different grains -- individual money is scoped to the principal committee only; committee-routed money spans every authorized committee -- combined here as the closest count-first read of PAC- vs individual-dependence available today. Part of the funding-concentration strip (#2730); donor-sector concentration and top-vendor share are not yet available.

Where the money goes

beneficiaries

Money disbursed by this candidate's principal committee: contributions to other candidates (the "raises big, then funds allies" signal), transfers to committees by destination type, vendor spending, and independent expenditures made.

Where the donors are

precinct-floored · suppressed
Partial data. About 15% of donor money is geocoded, concentrated in 9 states (AK, AL, AR, AZ, CO, CT, DC, DE, FL). Every other state — including the largest donor states (CA, NY, TX) — currently has zero geocoded rows. A blank state means not yet geocoded, never no donors here. Not a complete picture of donor geography.
Loading…

Aggregated itemized individual giving, geocoded to donor home address, suppressed for privacy (small or single-donor-dominated cells withheld). Unitemized giving has no geography.

Who runs it

Treasurer · YEUTTER, JEFFREY MR

Board / senior staff arrive from the payroll-disbursement derivation.

Committees

authorized
CommitteeRoleType
Michigan Congressional Victory '06 Committee Joint fundraising X
Walberg Bishop Victory Fund Joint fundraising N
Walberg Victory Fund Joint fundraising N
Walberg For Congress Principal campaign committee H

Money in

committee & PAC contributions

Contributing committees & PACs · 2008:

No committee contributions on file for this cycle.

Cross-party support

who funds both sides

32 of this candidate's 40 top committee funders also fund the other side.

Committee / PACOverall givingD / R
National Association Of Realtors Political Action Committee 50% / 50%
America'S Credit Unions Pac Of Credit Union National Association, Inc. 51% / 49%
Teachers Insurance Annuity Association Of America Pac (Tiaa Pac) 51% / 49%
Verizon Communications, Inc. Political Action Committee (Verizon Pac) 49% / 51%
National Beer Wholesalers Association Political Action Committee 48% / 52%
American Hotel And Lodging Association Political Action Committee ('Hotelpac') 47% / 53%
Charter Communications Inc. Political Action Committee 47% / 53%
Insured Retirement Institute Political Action Committee (Iri Pac) 53% / 47%
Unitedhealth Group Incorporated Pac (Unitedhealth Group Pac) 47% / 53%
American Optometric Association Political Action Committee 46% / 54%
Toyota Motor North America, Inc Political Action Committee (Toyota/Lexus Pac) 46% / 54%
Dykema Gossett Federal Pac 45% / 55%

Each committee's overall giving split by recipient party (by dollars).

Super PAC spending

$ held · counts

No independent expenditures on file for 2008 (2016 excluded).

Money out — top vendors

$ shown
VendorPaidPaymentsCategory
Transaxt $4,718 300 003 (Fundraising & solicitation)
Anedot Inc $1,252 92 003 (Fundraising & solicitation)
Campaign Solutions $855 48 003 (Fundraising & solicitation)
The Prosper Group Corporation $94,932 36 004 (Advertising)
Jamestown Associates $1,218,840 33 004 (Advertising)
The Prosper Group Corporation $102,386 33 004 (Advertising)
Rorke, Michael M $10,589 28 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Eftps $28,030 27 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Gerald Potts $15,600 26 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Rorke, Michael M $9,866 25 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Merchant Services $6,840 24 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Eftps $6,183 24 001 (Administrative / overhead)

Payment counts from the principal committee; dollar totals held. Arc maps of where money goes arrive with the geo layer.

Top expenditure categories

$ held
CategoryPayments
003 (Fundraising & solicitation)1,282
001 (Administrative / overhead)1,060
004 (Advertising)260
002 (Travel)195
011 (Political contributions)67
012 (Donations)65
007 (Campaign events)18
006 (Campaign materials)15

Disbursement categories by payment count; dollar rollups held.

Right of response

No response on file. The subject of this page may add a statement here.

Is this you? Claim this page to respond. Statements are the subject's own words, verified and moderated — the underlying data is unchanged.

One-stop candidate summary · money-dark until the corrected-financial refresh. Data as of March 11, 2026, 11 a.m..