elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Whitehouse, Sheldon

candidate · S6RI00221
Whitehouse, Sheldon RI · DEM · Senate · RI · incumbent
The seat — demographics, elections & money for this district full page ↗

Person: Whitehouse, Sheldon · every race, every cycle

11 cycles4 committees18 contributing committees352 vendors

Raised — contributing committees / cycle

Spent — vendor payments / cycle

IE support — independent expenditures for this candidate / cycle

Transferred out — other candidates funded / cycle

All four, combined -- 2016-2028

20162028
Raised Spent IE support Transferred out

2016–2028 · entity counts (money-dark); dollar trends light up at the flip. "Raised" is committee-routed contributions only — individual donors stay held pending the privacy decision, and there is no distinct bundler surface yet (#2488).

In the 2016 Senate field

RI

473 Senate candidates nationally in 2016.

#CandidateStatePartyRaised
1 Fetterman, John Karl PA DEM $60,730,598
2 Cortez Masto, Catherine NV DEM $59,540,356
3 Hassan, Margaret Wood NH DEM $35,587,066
4 Bennet, Michael F. CO DEM $17,127,591
5 Duckworth, L. Tammy IL DEM $14,884,078
6 Schumer, Charles E. NY DEM $13,811,846
7 Murray, Patty WA DEM $12,048,061
8 Harris, Kamala D CA DEM $11,824,890

The national Senate field for 2016, ranked by money raised. Party affiliation shown as filed — third-party and state-party labels (DFL, WFP, etc.) are not merged into DEM/REP. This candidate did not appear in the returned set.

Campaign contact

PROVIDENCE, RI, 02940

Website, phone and social accounts arrive with the campaign-contact ingest (FEC F1 + social sources).

Money raised vs spent

coming

Raised-vs-spent over time — the per-cycle totals surface is coming.

Where the money comes from

by source type

Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed) 79% · PACs 21% · Super PACs 0% · Party committees 0%

Source typeContributionsAmount
Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed)69999$4,866,369
PACs818$1,298,879
Super PACs2$5,000
Party committees9$4,240
Total (committee-sourced)$6,174,488

Money received from committees, split by the type of the paying committee (PAC, Super PAC, party, joint-fundraising, conduit). Individual (person) giving is aggregated separately with privacy suppression and is not included here.

Transfers in

from committees
Payer typeTransfersAmount
Joint-fundraising committees29$1,407,072
Total$1,407,072

Committee-to-committee transfers received by this candidate's principal committee, split by the type of the sending committee.

Individual-donor conduit dependency

lifetime

40% by dollars

44805 of 67730 individual contributions on file routed through a conduit, lifetime -- not per-cycle (the underlying edge source can't be cleanly split by year). Conduit dollars are the true donor's money, passed through a platform; not double-counted.

PAC vs. individual money

by dollars

Individual (direct) 84% · Committee-routed (PAC / party / JFA / conduit) 16%

67730 individual contributions to this candidate's principal committee vs 70828 committee-routed contributions across every committee this candidate has authorized ($33,032,723 vs $6,174,488). Two different grains -- individual money is scoped to the principal committee only; committee-routed money spans every authorized committee -- combined here as the closest count-first read of PAC- vs individual-dependence available today. Part of the funding-concentration strip (#2730); donor-sector concentration and top-vendor share are not yet available.

Where the money goes

beneficiaries

Money disbursed by this candidate's principal committee: contributions to other candidates (the "raises big, then funds allies" signal), transfers to committees by destination type, vendor spending, and independent expenditures made.

Where the donors are

precinct-floored · suppressed
Partial data. About 15% of donor money is geocoded, concentrated in 9 states (AK, AL, AR, AZ, CO, CT, DC, DE, FL). Every other state — including the largest donor states (CA, NY, TX) — currently has zero geocoded rows. A blank state means not yet geocoded, never no donors here. Not a complete picture of donor geography.
Loading…

Aggregated itemized individual giving, geocoded to donor home address, suppressed for privacy (small or single-donor-dominated cells withheld). Unitemized giving has no geography.

Who runs it

Treasurer · LOWEY, KEITH D.

Board / senior staff arrive from the payroll-disbursement derivation.

Committees

authorized
CommitteeRoleType
Rhode Island Democratic Senate Victory Fund Joint fundraising Y
Rhode Island Senate Victory 2012 Joint fundraising N
Searchlight Tahoe Victory Fund Joint fundraising N
Whitehouse For Senate Principal campaign committee S

Money in

committee & PAC contributions

Contributing committees & PACs · 2016:

No committee contributions on file for this cycle.

Cross-party support

who funds both sides

26 of this candidate's 40 top committee funders also fund the other side.

Committee / PACOverall givingD / R
National Association Of Realtors Political Action Committee 50% / 50%
National Confectioners Association Of The United States, Inc. Political Action Committee (Candy Pac) 50% / 50%
K&L Gates Llp Political Action Committee (Dc) 51% / 49%
National Association Of Real Estate Investment Trusts, Inc. Political Action Committee 49% / 51%
Cozen O'Connor Political Action Committee 52% / 48%
National Association Of Broadcasters Political Action Committee (Nabpac) 48% / 52%
National Beer Wholesalers Association Political Action Committee 48% / 52%
American Clean Power Association Cleanpower Pac 46% / 54%
American Osteopathic Information Association - Osteopathic Political Action Committee 45% / 55%
At&T Inc. Employee Federal Political Action Committee (At&T Employee Federal Pac) 45% / 55%
American Medical Association Political Action Committee 56% / 44%
Dla Piper Llp (Us) Political Action Committee (Dla Piper Pac) 44% / 56%

Each committee's overall giving split by recipient party (by dollars).

Super PAC spending

outside money

Supporting: 4 committees · 5 expenditures · $447  ·  Opposing: 1 · 8 · $82,830

CommitteeStanceAmount
Roosevelt Society Action opposes $82,830
Sierra Club Independent Action supports $10
Planned Parenthood Votes supports $36
Sierra Club Independent Action supports $10
Environment America Action Fund supports $336
Clean Wave supports $55

Independent expenditures for or against this candidate. 2016 excluded (known IE undercount).

1% of this candidate's receipts + outside spending is outside money (independent expenditures for/against, as a share of receipts plus outside spending).

Money out — top vendors

$ shown
VendorPaidPaymentsCategory
Complete Payroll Solutions $88,521 126
Actblue $81,031 115
Actblue $45,506 114
Complete Payroll Solutions $18,541 92
Actblue $7,071 74
McCabe, Meaghan E. $43,866 63
Beacon Mutual Insurance Co. $2,306 49
Suntrust Merchant Services $1,576 48
McCabe, Meaghan E. $36,030 46
Suntrust Merchant Services $1,726 44
Beacon Mutual Insurance Co. $1,216 41
Assemble The Agency, Llc $291,499 33

Payment counts from the principal committee; dollar totals held. Arc maps of where money goes arrive with the geo layer.

Top expenditure categories

$ held
CategoryPayments
001 (Administrative / overhead)286
004 (Advertising)43
003 (Fundraising & solicitation)25
006 (Campaign materials)9
002 (Travel)4
005 (Polling)3

Disbursement categories by payment count; dollar rollups held.

Right of response

No response on file. The subject of this page may add a statement here.

Is this you? Claim this page to respond. Statements are the subject's own words, verified and moderated — the underlying data is unchanged.

One-stop candidate summary · money-dark until the corrected-financial refresh. Data as of March 11, 2026, 11 a.m..