elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Hagerty, Bill

candidate · S0TN00169
Hagerty, Bill TN · REP · Senate · TN · incumbent
The seat — demographics, elections & money for this district full page ↗

Person: Hagerty, Bill · every race, every cycle

4 cycles1 committees299 contributing committees302 vendors

Raised — contributing committees / cycle

Spent — vendor payments / cycle

IE support — independent expenditures for this candidate / cycle

Transferred out — other candidates funded / cycle

All four, combined -- 2016-2028

20162028
Raised Spent IE support Transferred out

2016–2028 · entity counts (money-dark); dollar trends light up at the flip. "Raised" is committee-routed contributions only — individual donors stay held pending the privacy decision, and there is no distinct bundler surface yet (#2488).

In the 2026 Senate field

TN

Hagerty, Bill ranks #24 of 117 Senate candidates nationally in 2026.

#CandidateStatePartyRaised
1 Ossoff, T. Jonathan GA DEM $214,842,226
2 Sullivan, Dan AK REP $109,507,676
3 Graham, Lindsey O. SC REP $55,788,928
4 Peters, Gary MI DEM $42,624,020
5 McConnell, Mitch KY REP $41,405,744
6 Hickenlooper, John W. CO DEM $40,916,604
7 Daines, Steve MT REP $23,656,650
8 Booker, Cory A. NJ DEM $22,038,180
24 Hagerty, Bill (this candidate) TN REP $4,533,381

The national Senate field for 2026, ranked by money raised. Party affiliation shown as filed — third-party and state-party labels (DFL, WFP, etc.) are not merged into DEM/REP.

Campaign contact

NASHVILLE, TN, 372052193

Website, phone and social accounts arrive with the campaign-contact ingest (FEC F1 + social sources).

Money raised vs spent

coming

Raised-vs-spent over time — the per-cycle totals surface is coming.

Where the money comes from

by source type

PACs 74% · Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed) 24% · Party committees 2% · Super PACs 1%

Source typeContributionsAmount
PACs810$2,052,145
Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed)9137$670,011
Party committees1$44,600
Super PACs6$24,500
Total (committee-sourced)$2,791,256

Money received from committees, split by the type of the paying committee (PAC, Super PAC, party, joint-fundraising, conduit). Individual (person) giving is aggregated separately with privacy suppression and is not included here.

Transfers in

from committees
Payer typeTransfersAmount
Joint-fundraising committees39$1,010,702
Total$1,010,702

Committee-to-committee transfers received by this candidate's principal committee, split by the type of the sending committee.

Individual-donor conduit dependency

lifetime

25% by dollars

71420 of 83932 individual contributions on file routed through a conduit, lifetime -- not per-cycle (the underlying edge source can't be cleanly split by year). Conduit dollars are the true donor's money, passed through a platform; not double-counted.

PAC vs. individual money

by dollars

Individual (direct) 89% · Committee-routed (PAC / party / JFA / conduit) 11%

83932 individual contributions to this candidate's principal committee vs 9954 committee-routed contributions across every committee this candidate has authorized ($22,633,316 vs $2,791,256). Two different grains -- individual money is scoped to the principal committee only; committee-routed money spans every authorized committee -- combined here as the closest count-first read of PAC- vs individual-dependence available today. Part of the funding-concentration strip (#2730); donor-sector concentration and top-vendor share are not yet available.

Where the money goes

beneficiaries

Money disbursed by this candidate's principal committee: contributions to other candidates (the "raises big, then funds allies" signal), transfers to committees by destination type, vendor spending, and independent expenditures made.

Where the donors are

precinct-floored · suppressed
Partial data. About 15% of donor money is geocoded, concentrated in 9 states (AK, AL, AR, AZ, CO, CT, DC, DE, FL). Every other state — including the largest donor states (CA, NY, TX) — currently has zero geocoded rows. A blank state means not yet geocoded, never no donors here. Not a complete picture of donor geography.
Loading…

Aggregated itemized individual giving, geocoded to donor home address, suppressed for privacy (small or single-donor-dominated cells withheld). Unitemized giving has no geography.

Who runs it

Treasurer · WILLIAMSON, LES

Board / senior staff arrive from the payroll-disbursement derivation.

Committees

authorized
CommitteeRoleType
Team Hagerty Principal campaign committee S

Money in

committee & PAC contributions

Contributing committees & PACs · 2026:

No committee contributions on file for this cycle.

Cross-party support

who funds both sides

33 of this candidate's 40 top committee funders also fund the other side.

Committee / PACOverall givingD / R
Medtronic Inc. Pac 50% / 50%
America'S Credit Unions Pac Of Credit Union National Association, Inc. 51% / 49%
Smith & Nephew, Inc. Pac (S+N Pac) 49% / 51%
Mortgage Bankers Association Political Action Committee (Morpac) 48% / 52%
Beyond Finance Employee Political Action Committee 47% / 53%
The Cigna Group Employee Political Action Committee 53% / 47%
Brown-Forman Corporation Non-Partisan Committee For Responsible Government 46% / 54%
Depository Trust And Clearing Corporation Pac - Dtcc Pac; The 54% / 46%
Ernst & Young Political Action Committee 46% / 54%
National Venture Capital Association Venturepac 46% / 54%
Toyota Motor North America, Inc Political Action Committee (Toyota/Lexus Pac) 46% / 54%
Walmart Inc. Pac For Responsible Government 45% / 55%

Each committee's overall giving split by recipient party (by dollars).

Super PAC spending

$ held · counts

No independent expenditures on file for 2026 (2016 excluded).

Money out — top vendors

$ shown
VendorPaidPaymentsCategory
Winred Technical Services Llc $89,154 109 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Us Postal Service $2,220 90 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Anedot $4,813 83 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Pinnacle Bank $190,590 77 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Winred Technical Services Llc $72,697 74 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Pinnacle Bank $203,942 70 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Olympic Media $43,089 68 003 (Fundraising & solicitation)
Cmdi $39,280 48 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Roc Llc $8,567 44 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Smart Media Group $5,557,340 38 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Anedot $11,997 38 001 (Administrative / overhead)
The Lukens Company $260,968 32 003 (Fundraising & solicitation)

Payment counts from the principal committee; dollar totals held. Arc maps of where money goes arrive with the geo layer.

Top expenditure categories

$ held
CategoryPayments
001 (Administrative / overhead)1,601
003 (Fundraising & solicitation)594
004 (Advertising)99
002 (Travel)34
007 (Campaign events)2

Disbursement categories by payment count; dollar rollups held.

Right of response

No response on file. The subject of this page may add a statement here.

Is this you? Claim this page to respond. Statements are the subject's own words, verified and moderated — the underlying data is unchanged.

One-stop candidate summary · money-dark until the corrected-financial refresh. Data as of March 11, 2026, 11 a.m..