elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

McAdams, Ben

candidate · H8UT04053
McAdams, Ben UT · DEM · House · UT-04 · incumbent
The seat — demographics, elections & money for this district full page ↗

Person: McAdams, Ben · every race, every cycle

5 cycles1 committees23 contributing committees233 vendors

Raised — contributing committees / cycle

Spent — vendor payments / cycle

IE support — independent expenditures for this candidate / cycle

Transferred out — other candidates funded / cycle

All four, combined -- 2016-2028

20162028
Raised Spent IE support Transferred out

2016–2028 · entity counts (money-dark); dollar trends light up at the flip. "Raised" is committee-routed contributions only — individual donors stay held pending the privacy decision, and there is no distinct bundler surface yet (#2488).

In this race

2026

DEM

Candidate Status Cash on hand Contributing committees Raised / cycle Spent / cycle IE support / cycle Transferred / cycle
McAdams, Ben (this candidate) incumbent 268

REP

Candidate Status Cash on hand Contributing committees Raised / cycle Spent / cycle IE support / cycle Transferred / cycle
Owens, Burgess incumbent 228

Every candidate on file for this race. A party with more than one filer is a live primary contest -- who becomes that party's nominee isn't in the data yet. Cash on hand is the official FEC filing figure, as of the filing's own coverage date -- not a live estimate. The remaining columns are money-dark proxies (counts, not dollars); a dash means no data on file for that candidate yet. Click a column heading to sort.

Campaign contact

SLC, UT, 84106

Website, phone and social accounts arrive with the campaign-contact ingest (FEC F1 + social sources).

Money raised vs spent

coming

Raised-vs-spent over time — the per-cycle totals surface is coming.

Where the money comes from

by source type

Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed) 82% · PACs 17% · Party committees 0% · Super PACs 0%

Source typeContributionsAmount
Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed)60918$4,148,581
PACs500$877,396
Party committees48$12,309
Super PACs3$9,500
Total (committee-sourced)$5,047,787

Money received from committees, split by the type of the paying committee (PAC, Super PAC, party, joint-fundraising, conduit). Individual (person) giving is aggregated separately with privacy suppression and is not included here.

Transfers in

from committees
Payer typeTransfersAmount
Joint-fundraising committees5$64,846
Total$64,846

Committee-to-committee transfers received by this candidate's principal committee, split by the type of the sending committee.

Individual-donor conduit dependency

lifetime

69% by dollars

21112 of 24543 individual contributions on file routed through a conduit, lifetime -- not per-cycle (the underlying edge source can't be cleanly split by year). Conduit dollars are the true donor's money, passed through a platform; not double-counted.

PAC vs. individual money

by dollars

Individual (direct) 69% · Committee-routed (PAC / party / JFA / conduit) 31%

24543 individual contributions to this candidate's principal committee vs 61469 committee-routed contributions across every committee this candidate has authorized ($11,438,994 vs $5,047,787). Two different grains -- individual money is scoped to the principal committee only; committee-routed money spans every authorized committee -- combined here as the closest count-first read of PAC- vs individual-dependence available today. Part of the funding-concentration strip (#2730); donor-sector concentration and top-vendor share are not yet available.

Where the money goes

beneficiaries

Money disbursed by this candidate's principal committee: contributions to other candidates (the "raises big, then funds allies" signal), transfers to committees by destination type, vendor spending, and independent expenditures made.

Where the donors are

precinct-floored · suppressed
Partial data. About 15% of donor money is geocoded, concentrated in 9 states (AK, AL, AR, AZ, CO, CT, DC, DE, FL). Every other state — including the largest donor states (CA, NY, TX) — currently has zero geocoded rows. A blank state means not yet geocoded, never no donors here. Not a complete picture of donor geography.
Loading…

Aggregated itemized individual giving, geocoded to donor home address, suppressed for privacy (small or single-donor-dominated cells withheld). Unitemized giving has no geography.

Who runs it

Treasurer · NAKAMURA, FRANK M

Board / senior staff arrive from the payroll-disbursement derivation.

Committees

authorized
CommitteeRoleType
Friends Of Ben McAdams Principal campaign committee H

Money in

committee & PAC contributions

Contributing committees & PACs · 2026:

No committee contributions on file for this cycle.

Cross-party support

who funds both sides

27 of this candidate's 40 top committee funders also fund the other side.

Committee / PACOverall givingD / R
Honeywell International Political Action Committee 50% / 50%
National Association Of Realtors Political Action Committee 50% / 50%
L3Harris Technologies, Inc. Pac 51% / 49%
Teachers Insurance Annuity Association Of America Pac (Tiaa Pac) 51% / 49%
T-Mobile Us, Inc. Political Action Committee (T-Pac) 51% / 49%
Deloitte Political Action Committee 48% / 52%
Fmr Llc Political Action Committee - Federal (Fidelity Pac) 47% / 53%
Molina Healthcare, Inc. Pac 47% / 53%
National Multifamily Housing Council Political Action Committee 53% / 47%
American Council Of Engineering Companies (Acec/Pac) 46% / 54%
General Electric Company Aerospace Employee Political Action Committee (Ge Aerospace Pac) 46% / 54%
Pitney Bowes Inc. Political Action Committee 46% / 54%

Each committee's overall giving split by recipient party (by dollars).

Super PAC spending

$ held · counts

No independent expenditures on file for 2026 (2016 excluded).

Money out — top vendors

$ shown
VendorPaidPaymentsCategory
Actblue $57,999 64 003 (Fundraising & solicitation)
Sweeney, Jessica $63,402 34
Roberts, Andrew $100,184 34
Actblue $74,375 30
Fredrickson, Jessica $51,695 26 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Roberts, Andrew $82,635 26 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Jay, Brittani $20,101 21
Baker, Alyssa $26,282 21
Mandate Media $93,108 20
Roll, Carolyn $32,000 16
Gourley, Wendy D $16,678 16
Dental Select $1,186 16

Payment counts from the principal committee; dollar totals held. Arc maps of where money goes arrive with the geo layer.

Top expenditure categories

$ held
CategoryPayments
003 (Fundraising & solicitation)80
001 (Administrative / overhead)76

Disbursement categories by payment count; dollar rollups held.

Right of response

No response on file. The subject of this page may add a statement here.

Is this you? Claim this page to respond. Statements are the subject's own words, verified and moderated — the underlying data is unchanged.

One-stop candidate summary · money-dark until the corrected-financial refresh. Data as of March 11, 2026, 11 a.m..