elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Warner, Mark Robert

candidate · S6VA00093
Warner, Mark Robert VA · DEM · Senate · VA · incumbent
The seat — demographics, elections & money for this district full page ↗

Person: Warner, Mark Robert · every race, every cycle

13 cycles11 committees10 contributing committees0 vendors

Raised — contributing committees / cycle

Spent — vendor payments / cycle

IE support — independent expenditures for this candidate / cycle

Transferred out — other candidates funded / cycle

All four, combined -- 2016-2028

20162028
Raised Spent IE support Transferred out

2016–2028 · entity counts (money-dark); dollar trends light up at the flip. "Raised" is committee-routed contributions only — individual donors stay held pending the privacy decision, and there is no distinct bundler surface yet (#2488).

In the 2016 Senate field

VA

473 Senate candidates nationally in 2016.

#CandidateStatePartyRaised
1 Fetterman, John Karl PA DEM $60,730,598
2 Cortez Masto, Catherine NV DEM $59,540,356
3 Hassan, Margaret Wood NH DEM $35,587,066
4 Bennet, Michael F. CO DEM $17,127,591
5 Duckworth, L. Tammy IL DEM $14,884,078
6 Schumer, Charles E. NY DEM $13,811,846
7 Murray, Patty WA DEM $12,048,061
8 Harris, Kamala D CA DEM $11,824,890

The national Senate field for 2016, ranked by money raised. Party affiliation shown as filed — third-party and state-party labels (DFL, WFP, etc.) are not merged into DEM/REP. This candidate did not appear in the returned set.

Campaign contact

ALEXANDRIA, VA, 22314

Website, phone and social accounts arrive with the campaign-contact ingest (FEC F1 + social sources).

Money raised vs spent

coming

Raised-vs-spent over time — the per-cycle totals surface is coming.

Where the money comes from

by source type

Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed) 76% · PACs 24% · Super PACs 0%

Source typeContributionsAmount
Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed)111197$9,310,311
PACs1469$2,939,500
Super PACs9$23,500
Total (committee-sourced)$12,273,311

Money received from committees, split by the type of the paying committee (PAC, Super PAC, party, joint-fundraising, conduit). Individual (person) giving is aggregated separately with privacy suppression and is not included here.

Individual-donor conduit dependency

lifetime

38% by dollars

69458 of 108306 individual contributions on file routed through a conduit, lifetime -- not per-cycle (the underlying edge source can't be cleanly split by year). Conduit dollars are the true donor's money, passed through a platform; not double-counted.

PAC vs. individual money

by dollars

Individual (direct) 86% · Committee-routed (PAC / party / JFA / conduit) 14%

108306 individual contributions to this candidate's principal committee vs 112675 committee-routed contributions across every committee this candidate has authorized ($78,311,743 vs $12,273,311). Two different grains -- individual money is scoped to the principal committee only; committee-routed money spans every authorized committee -- combined here as the closest count-first read of PAC- vs individual-dependence available today. Part of the funding-concentration strip (#2730); donor-sector concentration and top-vendor share are not yet available.

Where the donors are

precinct-floored · suppressed
Partial data. About 15% of donor money is geocoded, concentrated in 9 states (AK, AL, AR, AZ, CO, CT, DC, DE, FL). Every other state — including the largest donor states (CA, NY, TX) — currently has zero geocoded rows. A blank state means not yet geocoded, never no donors here. Not a complete picture of donor geography.
Loading…

Aggregated itemized individual giving, geocoded to donor home address, suppressed for privacy (small or single-donor-dominated cells withheld). Unitemized giving has no geography.

Who runs it

Treasurer · NICHOLAS PERRINS

Board / senior staff arrive from the payroll-disbursement derivation.

Committees

authorized
CommitteeRoleType
Austin Innovation 2016 Joint fundraising H
Forward Together Warner Committee Joint fundraising N
Oregon-Virginia Fund Joint fundraising S
Va Senate Victory Fund Joint fundraising N
Virginia Together Joint fundraising N
Virginia Victory 2008 Joint fundraising N
Warner Joint Committee Joint fundraising S
Win Virginia 2008 Joint fundraising N
Win Virginia 2014 Joint fundraising N
Friends Of Mark Warner Principal campaign committee S
Friends Of Mark Warner Principal campaign committee S

Money in

committee & PAC contributions

Contributing committees & PACs · 2016:

No committee contributions on file for this cycle.

Cross-party support

who funds both sides

38 of this candidate's 40 top committee funders also fund the other side.

Committee / PACOverall givingD / R
Cummins Inc. Political Action Committee (Cipac) 51% / 49%
K&L Gates Llp Political Action Committee (Dc) 51% / 49%
L3Harris Technologies, Inc. Pac 51% / 49%
Mondelez International, Inc. Pac 51% / 49%
Peraton Corp. Political Action Committee (A.K.A. 'Peraton Pac') 49% / 51%
Ctia - The Wireless Association Political Action Committee 48% / 52%
Mortgage Bankers Association Political Action Committee (Morpac) 48% / 52%
National Emergency Medicine Political Action Committee / American College Of Emergency Physicians 52% / 48%
Samsung Electronics America Inc Political Action Committee 52% / 48%
Td Bank N.A. Political Action Committee 52% / 48%
Fmr Llc Political Action Committee - Federal (Fidelity Pac) 47% / 53%
The Options Clearing Corporation Pac 47% / 53%

Each committee's overall giving split by recipient party (by dollars).

Super PAC spending

outside money

Supporting: 4 committees · 6 expenditures · $1,320  ·  Opposing: 0 · 0 · —

CommitteeStanceAmount
Planned Parenthood Votes supports $60
Seiu Cope (Service Employees International Union Committee On Political Education) supports $1,000
Loudoun County Democratic Committee supports $242
Planned Parenthood Votes supports $9
Sierra Club Independent Action supports $10

Independent expenditures for or against this candidate. 2016 excluded (known IE undercount).

0% of this candidate's receipts + outside spending is outside money (independent expenditures for/against, as a share of receipts plus outside spending).

Money out — top vendors

$ shown

No vendor disbursements on file.

Right of response

No response on file. The subject of this page may add a statement here.

Is this you? Claim this page to respond. Statements are the subject's own words, verified and moderated — the underlying data is unchanged.

One-stop candidate summary · money-dark until the corrected-financial refresh. Data as of March 11, 2026, 11 a.m..