elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Rodgers, Annette

vendor

LINDEN, MI

6 committees paid them359 payments

Active cycles: 2024,2022,2020,2018,2016,2014,2012,2010

Committees served / cycle

Revenue concentration

leverage · by revenue
40.2%
top client · Great Lakes Pac
80.3%
top 3 clients
100.0%
top 10 clients
Concentrated
the top 3 clients dominate this vendor's revenue
Great Lakes Pac 40.2%
Great Lakes Pac 16.2%
Great Lakes Pac 24.0%
Great Lakes Pac 18.0%
Michigan Victory Fund 1.4%
Michigan Victory Fund 0.3%

Each client's share of this vendor's total revenue (disbursement dollars). The "captured vendor" signal — how dependent a vendor is on its largest clients.

Clients' race outcomes

not yet available

Race-by-race outcomes for this vendor's clients aren't shown yet -- they need election results data (by office, cycle, and stage) joined to the FEC/TEC candidates this vendor was paid by, which isn't wired into the warehouse yet. When it lands, this section will show three separate counts (by race, dollar-weighted, and competitive-races-only) for campaign-pay and independent-expenditure-pay separately -- never a single win rate, and never counted as a win for uncontested or write-in races.

CommitteePaidPaymentsCycles
Great Lakes Pac $120,567 25 2022
Great Lakes Pac $48,484 24 2018
Great Lakes Pac $72,000 18 2020
Great Lakes Pac $54,000 13 2024
Michigan Victory Fund $4,256 11 2018
Michigan Victory Fund $786 1 2020

Disbursements from each committee to this vendor.

Frequent collaborators

ranked by lift · vendors paid by the same committees
VendorShared committeesLift
Harland Clarke 3 69.2x
Actblue Technical Services 3 5.1x

Other vendors this vendor's clients hire far more than base rate — lift = how many times more likely a client of this vendor is to also use that vendor, vs. all committees that paid an FEC vendor. Pairs sharing fewer than 3 committees are dropped (too little data for a reliable lift). Money-dark: shared-committee count and lift, not dollars.

Vendor disbursement recipient · corrected FEC disbursement data.