elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Looks Good Printing And Sign Services

vendor

PHOENIX, AZ

001,006,003,004

7 committees paid them174 payments

Active cycles: 2024,2020,2018,2016,2014,2012,2010

Committees served / cycle

Revenue concentration

leverage · by revenue
35.4%
top client · Gallego For Arizona
78.1%
top 3 clients
100.0%
top 10 clients
Concentrated
the top 3 clients dominate this vendor's revenue
Gallego For Arizona 35.4%
Hiral For Congress 28.5%
Sinema For Arizona 14.2%
Hiral For Congress 18.6%
Gallego For Arizona 3.3%

Each client's share of this vendor's total revenue (disbursement dollars). The "captured vendor" signal — how dependent a vendor is on its largest clients.

Clients' race outcomes

not yet available

Race-by-race outcomes for this vendor's clients aren't shown yet -- they need election results data (by office, cycle, and stage) joined to the FEC/TEC candidates this vendor was paid by, which isn't wired into the warehouse yet. When it lands, this section will show three separate counts (by race, dollar-weighted, and competitive-races-only) for campaign-pay and independent-expenditure-pay separately -- never a single win rate, and never counted as a win for uncontested or write-in races.

CommitteePaidPaymentsCycles
Gallego For Arizona $67,346 26 2024
Hiral For Congress $54,155 11 2018
Sinema For Arizona $26,936 7 2018
Hiral For Congress $35,256 7 2020
Gallego For Arizona $6,308 1 2018

Disbursements from each committee to this vendor.

Frequent collaborators

ranked by lift · vendors paid by the same committees
VendorShared committeesLift
Menus Catering 3 425.3x
Lyft 3 52.2x
Southwest Airlines 3 22.1x
Google 3 15.0x
American Airlines 3 14.2x

Other vendors this vendor's clients hire far more than base rate — lift = how many times more likely a client of this vendor is to also use that vendor, vs. all committees that paid an FEC vendor. Pairs sharing fewer than 3 committees are dropped (too little data for a reliable lift). Money-dark: shared-committee count and lift, not dollars.

Vendor disbursement recipient · corrected FEC disbursement data.