SAN DIEGO, CA
001,101
Active cycles: 2024,2022,2020,2018,2016,2014,2012,2010,2008,2006,2004
Committees served / cycle
Each client's share of this vendor's total revenue (disbursement dollars). The "captured vendor" signal — how dependent a vendor is on its largest clients.
Race-by-race outcomes for this vendor's clients aren't shown yet -- they need election results data (by office, cycle, and stage) joined to the FEC/TEC candidates this vendor was paid by, which isn't wired into the warehouse yet. When it lands, this section will show three separate counts (by race, dollar-weighted, and competitive-races-only) for campaign-pay and independent-expenditure-pay separately -- never a single win rate, and never counted as a win for uncontested or write-in races.
Disbursements from each committee to this vendor.
| Vendor | Shared committees | Lift |
|---|---|---|
| Left Flank Strategies | 3 | 168.2x |
| Us Postmaster | 5 | 125.7x |
| Fileblue | 7 | 106.3x |
| Tuchin, Michael | 3 | 91.1x |
| At&T | 3 | 87.5x |
| Target | 5 | 77.6x |
Other vendors this vendor's clients hire far more than base rate — lift = how many times more likely a client of this vendor is to also use that vendor, vs. all committees that paid an FEC vendor. Pairs sharing fewer than 3 committees are dropped (too little data for a reliable lift). Money-dark: shared-committee count and lift, not dollars.
Vendor disbursement recipient · corrected FEC disbursement data.