elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Print And Copy Center

vendor

VERONA, PA

001,007,006,004

12 committees paid them139 payments

Active cycles: 2022,2020,2018,2016,2012,2010,2008,2006,2004

Committees served / cycle

Revenue concentration

leverage · by revenue
84.8%
top client · Fetterman For Pa
94.0%
top 3 clients
100.0%
top 10 clients
Captured
one client is a majority of this vendor's revenue
Fetterman For Pa 84.8%
Beaver County Democratic Committee 1.6%
Americans Against Socialist Authoritarians Pac (Amasa Pac) 7.7%
Fetterman Victory Fund 3.5%
Committee To Elect Daniel Smith Jr. 0.3%
Dinicola For Congress 0.6%
Keystone Future Pac 1.6%

Each client's share of this vendor's total revenue (disbursement dollars). The "captured vendor" signal — how dependent a vendor is on its largest clients.

Clients' race outcomes

not yet available

Race-by-race outcomes for this vendor's clients aren't shown yet -- they need election results data (by office, cycle, and stage) joined to the FEC/TEC candidates this vendor was paid by, which isn't wired into the warehouse yet. When it lands, this section will show three separate counts (by race, dollar-weighted, and competitive-races-only) for campaign-pay and independent-expenditure-pay separately -- never a single win rate, and never counted as a win for uncontested or write-in races.

CommitteePaidPaymentsCycles
Fetterman For Pa $160,245 28 2022
Beaver County Democratic Committee $3,007 8 2018
Americans Against Socialist Authoritarians Pac (Amasa Pac) $14,498 5 2020
Fetterman Victory Fund $6,574 1 2022
Committee To Elect Daniel Smith Jr. $643 1 2020
Dinicola For Congress $1,136 1 2018
Keystone Future Pac $2,936 1 2018

Disbursements from each committee to this vendor.

Frequent collaborators

ranked by lift · vendors paid by the same committees
VendorShared committeesLift
Usps 3 150.8x
Facebook 3 5.4x
Actblue Technical Services 3 2.2x

Other vendors this vendor's clients hire far more than base rate — lift = how many times more likely a client of this vendor is to also use that vendor, vs. all committees that paid an FEC vendor. Pairs sharing fewer than 3 committees are dropped (too little data for a reliable lift). Money-dark: shared-committee count and lift, not dollars.

Vendor disbursement recipient · corrected FEC disbursement data.