elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Gersten, Sarah

vendor

CHICAGO, IL

2 committees paid them639 payments

Active cycles: 2024,2022,2020,2018,2016,2014,2012,2010,2008,2006,2004

Committees served / cycle

Revenue concentration

leverage · by revenue
18.2%
71.0%
top 3 clients
100.0%
top 10 clients
Concentrated
the top 3 clients dominate this vendor's revenue
Schakowsky For Congress 18.2%
Schakowsky For Congress 25.6%
Schakowsky For Congress 27.2%
Schakowsky For Congress 17.3%
Progressive Choices Pac 2.8%
Progressive Choices Pac 2.8%
Progressive Choices Pac 3.1%
Progressive Choices Pac 2.9%

Each client's share of this vendor's total revenue (disbursement dollars). The "captured vendor" signal — how dependent a vendor is on its largest clients.

Clients' race outcomes

not yet available

Race-by-race outcomes for this vendor's clients aren't shown yet -- they need election results data (by office, cycle, and stage) joined to the FEC/TEC candidates this vendor was paid by, which isn't wired into the warehouse yet. When it lands, this section will show three separate counts (by race, dollar-weighted, and competitive-races-only) for campaign-pay and independent-expenditure-pay separately -- never a single win rate, and never counted as a win for uncontested or write-in races.

CommitteePaidPaymentsCycles
Schakowsky For Congress $150,767 56 2024
Schakowsky For Congress $211,621 55 2018
Schakowsky For Congress $224,834 50 2022
Schakowsky For Congress $143,250 31 2020
Progressive Choices Pac $23,470 3 2018
Progressive Choices Pac $23,500 2 2020
Progressive Choices Pac $26,000 2 2022
Progressive Choices Pac $24,000 2 2024

Disbursements from each committee to this vendor.

Frequent collaborators

ranked by lift · vendors paid by the same committees
VendorShared committeesLift
Actblue Technical Services 3 5.1x

Other vendors this vendor's clients hire far more than base rate — lift = how many times more likely a client of this vendor is to also use that vendor, vs. all committees that paid an FEC vendor. Pairs sharing fewer than 3 committees are dropped (too little data for a reliable lift). Money-dark: shared-committee count and lift, not dollars.

Vendor disbursement recipient · corrected FEC disbursement data.