elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Gumbinner & Davies Communications

vendor

WASHINGTON, DC

004

8 committees paid them32 payments

Active cycles: 2024,2022,2020,2018,2016,2014,2012

Committees served / cycle

Revenue concentration

leverage · by revenue
3.0%
top client · Hmp
8.3%
top 3 clients
100.0%
top 10 clients
Balanced
moderate client concentration
Hmp 3.0%
Legislative Majority Pac 3.4%
Landsman For Congress 1.8%
Landsman For Congress 1.2%
Progressive Turnout Project 89.5%
Hmp 0.1%
Blumenthal For Connecticut 0.2%
Dan Roberti For Congress 0.1%

Each client's share of this vendor's total revenue (disbursement dollars). The "captured vendor" signal — how dependent a vendor is on its largest clients.

Clients' race outcomes

not yet available

Race-by-race outcomes for this vendor's clients aren't shown yet -- they need election results data (by office, cycle, and stage) joined to the FEC/TEC candidates this vendor was paid by, which isn't wired into the warehouse yet. When it lands, this section will show three separate counts (by race, dollar-weighted, and competitive-races-only) for campaign-pay and independent-expenditure-pay separately -- never a single win rate, and never counted as a win for uncontested or write-in races.

CommitteePaidPaymentsCycles
Hmp $38,282 10 2022
Legislative Majority Pac $43,459 7 2018
Landsman For Congress $22,950 5 2024
Landsman For Congress $14,748 5 2022
Progressive Turnout Project $1,134,691 4 2022
Hmp $1,500 3 2018
Blumenthal For Connecticut $2,411 1 2022
Dan Roberti For Congress $1,500 1 2018
Bold Future Pac $8,335 1 2018

Disbursements from each committee to this vendor.

Frequent collaborators

ranked by lift · vendors paid by the same committees
VendorShared committeesLift
Elias Law Group 5 32.8x
Amalgamated Bank 3 6.4x
Actblue Technical Services 5 3.7x

Other vendors this vendor's clients hire far more than base rate — lift = how many times more likely a client of this vendor is to also use that vendor, vs. all committees that paid an FEC vendor. Pairs sharing fewer than 3 committees are dropped (too little data for a reliable lift). Money-dark: shared-committee count and lift, not dollars.

Vendor disbursement recipient · corrected FEC disbursement data.