elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Galdo, Maria L

vendor

ALEXANDRIA, VA

7 committees paid them147 payments

Active cycles: 2024,2022,2020,2018,2016,2014,2008,2006,2004

Committees served / cycle

Revenue concentration

leverage · by revenue
26.3%
47.5%
top 3 clients
99.3%
top 10 clients
Balanced
moderate client concentration
The Good Land Committee, Inc. 26.3%
2020 Fourth District Victory Fund 6.2%
Utah State Democratic Committee 15.0%
Utah State Democratic Committee 24.9%
Pa Values 6.2%
The Good Land Committee, Inc. 7.9%
Pa Values 3.5%
Utah State Democratic Committee 3.1%

Each client's share of this vendor's total revenue (disbursement dollars). The "captured vendor" signal — how dependent a vendor is on its largest clients.

Clients' race outcomes

not yet available

Race-by-race outcomes for this vendor's clients aren't shown yet -- they need election results data (by office, cycle, and stage) joined to the FEC/TEC candidates this vendor was paid by, which isn't wired into the warehouse yet. When it lands, this section will show three separate counts (by race, dollar-weighted, and competitive-races-only) for campaign-pay and independent-expenditure-pay separately -- never a single win rate, and never counted as a win for uncontested or write-in races.

CommitteePaidPaymentsCycles
The Good Land Committee, Inc. $38,000 16 2020
2020 Fourth District Victory Fund $9,000 9 2020
Utah State Democratic Committee $21,750 8 2022
Utah State Democratic Committee $36,000 8 2024
Pa Values $9,000 5 2018
The Good Land Committee, Inc. $11,500 4 2022
Pa Values $5,000 4 2022
Utah State Democratic Committee $4,500 4 2020
Pa Values $2,000 2 2020
Pa Values $7,000 2 2024
Pa-Ct Victory Fund $1,000 1 2020

Disbursements from each committee to this vendor.

Frequent collaborators

ranked by lift · vendors paid by the same committees
VendorShared committeesLift
Ngp Van 3 9.0x
Actblue Technical Services 3 2.6x

Other vendors this vendor's clients hire far more than base rate — lift = how many times more likely a client of this vendor is to also use that vendor, vs. all committees that paid an FEC vendor. Pairs sharing fewer than 3 committees are dropped (too little data for a reliable lift). Money-dark: shared-committee count and lift, not dollars.

Vendor disbursement recipient · corrected FEC disbursement data.