elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Postcards Direct

vendor

OKLAHOMA CITY, OK

001,006,003,004

10 committees paid them105 payments

Active cycles: 2022,2020,2018,2016,2014

Committees served / cycle

Revenue concentration

leverage · by revenue
36.0%
56.0%
top 3 clients
100.0%
top 10 clients
Balanced
moderate client concentration
Kendra Horn For Senate 36.0%
Kendra Horn For Senate 8.5%
Kendra Horn For Senate 11.5%
Tom Guild For Congress 17.9%
Oklahoma Democratic Party 5.9%
Ed Porter For Congress, Make Oklahoma Strong 1.0%
Ok Integrity Pac 4.1%
Tom Guild For Congress 14.3%

Each client's share of this vendor's total revenue (disbursement dollars). The "captured vendor" signal — how dependent a vendor is on its largest clients.

Clients' race outcomes

not yet available

Race-by-race outcomes for this vendor's clients aren't shown yet -- they need election results data (by office, cycle, and stage) joined to the FEC/TEC candidates this vendor was paid by, which isn't wired into the warehouse yet. When it lands, this section will show three separate counts (by race, dollar-weighted, and competitive-races-only) for campaign-pay and independent-expenditure-pay separately -- never a single win rate, and never counted as a win for uncontested or write-in races.

CommitteePaidPaymentsCycles
Kendra Horn For Senate $15,089 25 2022
Kendra Horn For Senate $3,585 23 2018
Kendra Horn For Senate $4,829 20 2020
Tom Guild For Congress $7,513 9 2018
Oklahoma Democratic Party $2,459 4 2020
Ed Porter For Congress, Make Oklahoma Strong $410 3 2018
Ok Integrity Pac $1,720 2 2022
Tom Guild For Congress $6,000 1 2020
Jht For Congress $358 1 2022

Disbursements from each committee to this vendor.

Frequent collaborators

ranked by lift · vendors paid by the same committees
VendorShared committeesLift
Campaign Technology Professionals 5 911.3x
Usps 3 588.8x
Oklahoma Democratic Party 3 402.9x
Actblue 3 6.7x
Facebook 4 6.3x
Actblue Technical Services 3 1.9x

Other vendors this vendor's clients hire far more than base rate — lift = how many times more likely a client of this vendor is to also use that vendor, vs. all committees that paid an FEC vendor. Pairs sharing fewer than 3 committees are dropped (too little data for a reliable lift). Money-dark: shared-committee count and lift, not dollars.

Vendor disbursement recipient · corrected FEC disbursement data.