elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Ces Mail Communications Inc

vendor

RALEIGH, NC

003,004

4 committees paid them12 payments

Active cycles: 2022,2018,2016,2014

Committees served / cycle

Revenue concentration

leverage · by revenue
48.9%
90.6%
top 3 clients
100.0%
top 10 clients
Concentrated
the top 3 clients dominate this vendor's revenue
Wiley Nickel For North Carolina 48.9%
Special Operations Speaks Pac - Sos Pac 16.4%
Committee To Elect Frank McNeill 25.2%
Watts For Congress 9.4%

Each client's share of this vendor's total revenue (disbursement dollars). The "captured vendor" signal — how dependent a vendor is on its largest clients.

Clients' race outcomes

not yet available

Race-by-race outcomes for this vendor's clients aren't shown yet -- they need election results data (by office, cycle, and stage) joined to the FEC/TEC candidates this vendor was paid by, which isn't wired into the warehouse yet. When it lands, this section will show three separate counts (by race, dollar-weighted, and competitive-races-only) for campaign-pay and independent-expenditure-pay separately -- never a single win rate, and never counted as a win for uncontested or write-in races.

CommitteePaidPaymentsCycles
Wiley Nickel For North Carolina $3,285 7 2022
Special Operations Speaks Pac - Sos Pac $1,100 1 2018
Committee To Elect Frank McNeill $1,695 1 2018
Watts For Congress $634 1 2018

Disbursements from each committee to this vendor.

Frequent collaborators

ranked by lift · vendors paid by the same committees
VendorShared committeesLift
Lasting Printing & Graphics 3 1275.8x
Internal Revenue Service 3 70.9x
Democracy Engine Llc 3 21.5x
Amalgamated Bank 3 7.5x
Actblue Technical Services 3 2.6x

Other vendors this vendor's clients hire far more than base rate — lift = how many times more likely a client of this vendor is to also use that vendor, vs. all committees that paid an FEC vendor. Pairs sharing fewer than 3 committees are dropped (too little data for a reliable lift). Money-dark: shared-committee count and lift, not dollars.

Vendor disbursement recipient · corrected FEC disbursement data.