elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Aceves Communications

vendor

HOUSTON, TX

PRINTING,CONSULT,ADVERTISE,OVERHEAD,FUNDRAISE,SALARIES,POLLING

10 committees paid them55 payments

Active cycles: 2022,2020,2018

Committees served / cycle

Revenue concentration

leverage · by revenue
25.9%
top client · Sima For Texas
56.0%
top 3 clients
100.0%
top 10 clients
Balanced
moderate client concentration
Sima For Texas 25.9%
Sri For Congress 1.6%
Dscc 28.4%
Dscc 43.6%
Sylvia Garcia For Congress 0.4%

Each client's share of this vendor's total revenue (disbursement dollars). The "captured vendor" signal — how dependent a vendor is on its largest clients.

Clients' race outcomes

not yet available

Race-by-race outcomes for this vendor's clients aren't shown yet -- they need election results data (by office, cycle, and stage) joined to the FEC/TEC candidates this vendor was paid by, which isn't wired into the warehouse yet. When it lands, this section will show three separate counts (by race, dollar-weighted, and competitive-races-only) for campaign-pay and independent-expenditure-pay separately -- never a single win rate, and never counted as a win for uncontested or write-in races.

CommitteePaidPaymentsCycles
Sima For Texas $70,754 5 2020
Sri For Congress $4,500 3 2018
Dscc $77,438 1 2020
Dscc $118,969 1 2022
Sylvia Garcia For Congress $1,122 1 2022

Disbursements from each committee to this vendor.

Frequent collaborators

ranked by lift · vendors paid by the same committees
VendorShared committeesLift
Left Hook 3 291.6x
Paragon Payment Solutions 3 71.2x
Public Policy Polling 3 41.7x
Amalgamated Bank 3 15.5x
Amazon 3 10.5x
Actblue Technical Services 4 4.1x

Other vendors this vendor's clients hire far more than base rate — lift = how many times more likely a client of this vendor is to also use that vendor, vs. all committees that paid an FEC vendor. Pairs sharing fewer than 3 committees are dropped (too little data for a reliable lift). Money-dark: shared-committee count and lift, not dollars.

Vendor disbursement recipient · corrected FEC disbursement data.