elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Rockwell, Page

vendor

SAN FRANCISCO, CA

4 committees paid them4 payments

Active cycles: 2024

Committees served / cycle

Revenue concentration

leverage · by revenue
7.9%
71.1%
top 3 clients
100.0%
top 10 clients
Concentrated
the top 3 clients dominate this vendor's revenue
North Carolina Democratic Party - Federal 7.9%
Nevada State Democratic Party 16.8%
Arizona Democratic Party 46.4%
New Hampshire Democratic Party 28.9%

Each client's share of this vendor's total revenue (disbursement dollars). The "captured vendor" signal — how dependent a vendor is on its largest clients.

Clients' race outcomes

not yet available

Race-by-race outcomes for this vendor's clients aren't shown yet -- they need election results data (by office, cycle, and stage) joined to the FEC/TEC candidates this vendor was paid by, which isn't wired into the warehouse yet. When it lands, this section will show three separate counts (by race, dollar-weighted, and competitive-races-only) for campaign-pay and independent-expenditure-pay separately -- never a single win rate, and never counted as a win for uncontested or write-in races.

CommitteePaidPaymentsCycles
North Carolina Democratic Party - Federal $644 1 2024
Nevada State Democratic Party $1,368 1 2024
Arizona Democratic Party $3,780 1 2024
New Hampshire Democratic Party $2,352 1 2024

Disbursements from each committee to this vendor.

Frequent collaborators

ranked by lift · vendors paid by the same committees
VendorShared committeesLift
Cohler, Pia 3 5103.2x
Linet, Martha 3 1701.1x
Hull, Megan 4 1458.1x
Maritz, Paul 3 765.5x
Levy, John 4 729.0x
Grilikhes-Lasky, Antonia 3 546.8x

Other vendors this vendor's clients hire far more than base rate — lift = how many times more likely a client of this vendor is to also use that vendor, vs. all committees that paid an FEC vendor. Pairs sharing fewer than 3 committees are dropped (too little data for a reliable lift). Money-dark: shared-committee count and lift, not dollars.

Vendor disbursement recipient · corrected FEC disbursement data.