elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Seamless

vendor

NEW YORK, NY

001,007,003

41 committees paid them246 payments

Active cycles: 2024,2022,2020,2018,2016,2014,2012,2010

Committees served / cycle

Revenue concentration

leverage · by revenue
30.5%
top client · Max Rose For Congress
57.8%
top 3 clients
100.0%
top 10 clients
Balanced
moderate client concentration
Max Rose For Congress 30.5%
Ctc Action 16.7%
Ilhan For Congress 10.6%
Progressive Change Campaign Committee 6.9%
Max Rose For Congress 18.2%
The Good Land Committee, Inc. 17.1%

Each client's share of this vendor's total revenue (disbursement dollars). The "captured vendor" signal — how dependent a vendor is on its largest clients.

Clients' race outcomes

not yet available

Race-by-race outcomes for this vendor's clients aren't shown yet -- they need election results data (by office, cycle, and stage) joined to the FEC/TEC candidates this vendor was paid by, which isn't wired into the warehouse yet. When it lands, this section will show three separate counts (by race, dollar-weighted, and competitive-races-only) for campaign-pay and independent-expenditure-pay separately -- never a single win rate, and never counted as a win for uncontested or write-in races.

CommitteePaidPaymentsCycles
Max Rose For Congress $776 10 2018
Ctc Action $427 6 2022
Ilhan For Congress $270 4 2024
Progressive Change Campaign Committee $175 3 2020
Max Rose For Congress $464 2 2020
The Good Land Committee, Inc. $435 1 2020

Disbursements from each committee to this vendor.

Frequent collaborators

ranked by lift · vendors paid by the same committees
VendorShared committeesLift
New York Times 4 295.8x
Ups 3 69.0x
Frontier Airlines 3 54.0x
Jetblue 3 41.8x
Squarespace 4 39.4x
Expedia 4 33.5x

Other vendors this vendor's clients hire far more than base rate — lift = how many times more likely a client of this vendor is to also use that vendor, vs. all committees that paid an FEC vendor. Pairs sharing fewer than 3 committees are dropped (too little data for a reliable lift). Money-dark: shared-committee count and lift, not dollars.

Vendor disbursement recipient · corrected FEC disbursement data.