elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

The Perkey Group

vendor

LOUISVILLE, KY

001

6 committees paid them19 payments

Active cycles: 2024,2022,2020

Committees served / cycle

Revenue concentration

leverage · by revenue
10.8%
top client · Onward America
82.3%
top 3 clients
100.0%
top 10 clients
Concentrated
the top 3 clients dominate this vendor's revenue
Onward America 10.8%
Matsui For Congress 56.4%
Booker For Kentucky 15.1%
Kentucky State Democratic Central Executive Committee 5.7%
E M Krause Committee To Elect 4 Nv 1.1%
E M Krause Committee To Elect 4 Nv 3.2%
Committee To Elect Kim Mangone For Congress 7.6%

Each client's share of this vendor's total revenue (disbursement dollars). The "captured vendor" signal — how dependent a vendor is on its largest clients.

Clients' race outcomes

not yet available

Race-by-race outcomes for this vendor's clients aren't shown yet -- they need election results data (by office, cycle, and stage) joined to the FEC/TEC candidates this vendor was paid by, which isn't wired into the warehouse yet. When it lands, this section will show three separate counts (by race, dollar-weighted, and competitive-races-only) for campaign-pay and independent-expenditure-pay separately -- never a single win rate, and never counted as a win for uncontested or write-in races.

CommitteePaidPaymentsCycles
Onward America $28,500 5 2022
Matsui For Congress $149,360 4 2022
Booker For Kentucky $40,000 4 2022
Kentucky State Democratic Central Executive Committee $15,143 3 2024
E M Krause Committee To Elect 4 Nv $3,000 2 2024
E M Krause Committee To Elect 4 Nv $8,596 2 2022
Committee To Elect Kim Mangone For Congress $20,000 1 2020

Disbursements from each committee to this vendor.

Frequent collaborators

ranked by lift · vendors paid by the same committees
VendorShared committeesLift
Scale To Win 3 22.8x
Google 3 7.5x
Actblue Technical Services 5 4.3x

Other vendors this vendor's clients hire far more than base rate — lift = how many times more likely a client of this vendor is to also use that vendor, vs. all committees that paid an FEC vendor. Pairs sharing fewer than 3 committees are dropped (too little data for a reliable lift). Money-dark: shared-committee count and lift, not dollars.

Vendor disbursement recipient · corrected FEC disbursement data.