elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Eckert, Amy

vendor

WASHINGTON, DC

5 committees paid them8 payments

Active cycles: 2020,2018

Committees served / cycle

Revenue concentration

leverage · by revenue
7.1%
top client · Van Drew For Congress
84.9%
top 3 clients
100.0%
top 10 clients
Concentrated
the top 3 clients dominate this vendor's revenue
Van Drew For Congress 7.1%
Common Good Pac 77.8%
National Security Democrats Pac 0.0%
Joe Morelle For Congress 3.3%
Andy Kim For New Jersey 11.8%

Each client's share of this vendor's total revenue (disbursement dollars). The "captured vendor" signal — how dependent a vendor is on its largest clients.

Clients' race outcomes

not yet available

Race-by-race outcomes for this vendor's clients aren't shown yet -- they need election results data (by office, cycle, and stage) joined to the FEC/TEC candidates this vendor was paid by, which isn't wired into the warehouse yet. When it lands, this section will show three separate counts (by race, dollar-weighted, and competitive-races-only) for campaign-pay and independent-expenditure-pay separately -- never a single win rate, and never counted as a win for uncontested or write-in races.

CommitteePaidPaymentsCycles
Van Drew For Congress $510 2 2018
Common Good Pac $5,553 2 2020
National Security Democrats Pac $0 2 2020
Joe Morelle For Congress $235 1 2018
Andy Kim For New Jersey $840 1 2020

Disbursements from each committee to this vendor.

Frequent collaborators

ranked by lift · vendors paid by the same committees
VendorShared committeesLift
Eckert & Associates 3 765.5x
National Democratic Club 3 43.3x
Amalgamated Bank 3 9.0x
Actblue Technical Services 4 4.1x

Other vendors this vendor's clients hire far more than base rate — lift = how many times more likely a client of this vendor is to also use that vendor, vs. all committees that paid an FEC vendor. Pairs sharing fewer than 3 committees are dropped (too little data for a reliable lift). Money-dark: shared-committee count and lift, not dollars.

Vendor disbursement recipient · corrected FEC disbursement data.