elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Rao, Jay

vendor

CHARLOTTE, NC

001,003

12 committees paid them60 payments

Active cycles: 2022,2020,2018,2016,2014

Committees served / cycle

Revenue concentration

leverage · by revenue
31.2%
67.6%
top 3 clients
100.0%
top 10 clients
Concentrated
the top 3 clients dominate this vendor's revenue
Gavin Clarkson For Congress 31.2%
Sostack For Congress 30.8%
Kim For Utah 5.5%
Gatorpac 2.0%
Covert For Congress 1.8%
Gallegos For Congress 8.6%
Harbick For Us Senate 20.0%

Each client's share of this vendor's total revenue (disbursement dollars). The "captured vendor" signal — how dependent a vendor is on its largest clients.

Clients' race outcomes

not yet available

Race-by-race outcomes for this vendor's clients aren't shown yet -- they need election results data (by office, cycle, and stage) joined to the FEC/TEC candidates this vendor was paid by, which isn't wired into the warehouse yet. When it lands, this section will show three separate counts (by race, dollar-weighted, and competitive-races-only) for campaign-pay and independent-expenditure-pay separately -- never a single win rate, and never counted as a win for uncontested or write-in races.

CommitteePaidPaymentsCycles
Gavin Clarkson For Congress $21,235 5 2018
Sostack For Congress $20,930 3 2018
Kim For Utah $3,750 2 2020
Gatorpac $1,374 2 2018
Covert For Congress $1,250 1 2020
Gallegos For Congress $5,850 1 2018
Harbick For Us Senate $13,582 1 2022

Disbursements from each committee to this vendor.

Frequent collaborators

ranked by lift · vendors paid by the same committees
VendorShared committeesLift
In Compliance Inc. 3 182.3x
Aristotle International Inc. 3 110.7x
Anedot 3 3.8x

Other vendors this vendor's clients hire far more than base rate — lift = how many times more likely a client of this vendor is to also use that vendor, vs. all committees that paid an FEC vendor. Pairs sharing fewer than 3 committees are dropped (too little data for a reliable lift). Money-dark: shared-committee count and lift, not dollars.

Vendor disbursement recipient · corrected FEC disbursement data.