elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Hart Research Associates, Inc.

vendor

WASHINGTON, DC

001

8 committees paid them76 payments

Active cycles: 2024,2022,2020,2018,2016,2014,2006,2004

Committees served / cycle

Revenue concentration

leverage · by revenue
19.5%
top client · Smp
70.1%
top 3 clients
100.0%
top 10 clients
Concentrated
the top 3 clients dominate this vendor's revenue
Smp 19.5%
Smp 17.4%
Smp 33.2%
Women Vote 4.5%
Smp 19.5%
Van Hollen For Senate 3.3%
Cooper For Congress 1.3%
Clarence Lam For Congress 1.3%

Each client's share of this vendor's total revenue (disbursement dollars). The "captured vendor" signal — how dependent a vendor is on its largest clients.

Clients' race outcomes

not yet available

Race-by-race outcomes for this vendor's clients aren't shown yet -- they need election results data (by office, cycle, and stage) joined to the FEC/TEC candidates this vendor was paid by, which isn't wired into the warehouse yet. When it lands, this section will show three separate counts (by race, dollar-weighted, and competitive-races-only) for campaign-pay and independent-expenditure-pay separately -- never a single win rate, and never counted as a win for uncontested or write-in races.

CommitteePaidPaymentsCycles
Smp $510,500 11 2018
Smp $453,900 10 2020
Smp $869,208 9 2022
Women Vote $116,375 5 2022
Smp $509,500 4 2024
Van Hollen For Senate $87,000 2 2022
Cooper For Congress $35,000 1 2020
Clarence Lam For Congress $33,000 1 2024

Disbursements from each committee to this vendor.

Frequent collaborators

ranked by lift · vendors paid by the same committees
VendorShared committeesLift
Federal Election Commission 3 37.4x
Ngp Van, Inc. 3 12.3x
Actblue Technical Services 5 4.3x

Other vendors this vendor's clients hire far more than base rate — lift = how many times more likely a client of this vendor is to also use that vendor, vs. all committees that paid an FEC vendor. Pairs sharing fewer than 3 committees are dropped (too little data for a reliable lift). Money-dark: shared-committee count and lift, not dollars.

Vendor disbursement recipient · corrected FEC disbursement data.