elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Twitter Inc.

vendor

SAN FRANCISCO, CA

ADVERTISE,OVERHEAD,001,004

20 committees paid them120 payments

Active cycles: 2024,2020,2018,2016,2014,2012

Committees served / cycle

Revenue concentration

leverage · by revenue
9.3%
top client · New Nation Rising
17.8%
top 3 clients
100.0%
top 10 clients
Balanced
moderate client concentration
New Nation Rising 9.3%
Deprogram America 5.3%
Marc Veasey Congressional Campaign Committee 3.1%
Claiming Our Voices 71.8%
Freedom Partners Action Fund, Inc. 10.4%

Each client's share of this vendor's total revenue (disbursement dollars). The "captured vendor" signal — how dependent a vendor is on its largest clients.

Clients' race outcomes

not yet available

Race-by-race outcomes for this vendor's clients aren't shown yet -- they need election results data (by office, cycle, and stage) joined to the FEC/TEC candidates this vendor was paid by, which isn't wired into the warehouse yet. When it lands, this section will show three separate counts (by race, dollar-weighted, and competitive-races-only) for campaign-pay and independent-expenditure-pay separately -- never a single win rate, and never counted as a win for uncontested or write-in races.

CommitteePaidPaymentsCycles
New Nation Rising $891 9 2018
Deprogram America $512 6 2024
Marc Veasey Congressional Campaign Committee $297 3 2020
Claiming Our Voices $6,874 3 2024
Freedom Partners Action Fund, Inc. $1,000 2 2018

Disbursements from each committee to this vendor.

Frequent collaborators

ranked by lift · vendors paid by the same committees
VendorShared committeesLift
Actblue Technical Services 4 3.4x

Other vendors this vendor's clients hire far more than base rate — lift = how many times more likely a client of this vendor is to also use that vendor, vs. all committees that paid an FEC vendor. Pairs sharing fewer than 3 committees are dropped (too little data for a reliable lift). Money-dark: shared-committee count and lift, not dollars.

Vendor disbursement recipient · corrected FEC disbursement data.