SAN FRANCISCO, CA
OVERHEAD,001
Active cycles: 2024,2022,2020,2018
Committees served / cycle
Each client's share of this vendor's total revenue (disbursement dollars). The "captured vendor" signal — how dependent a vendor is on its largest clients.
Race-by-race outcomes for this vendor's clients aren't shown yet -- they need election results data (by office, cycle, and stage) joined to the FEC/TEC candidates this vendor was paid by, which isn't wired into the warehouse yet. When it lands, this section will show three separate counts (by race, dollar-weighted, and competitive-races-only) for campaign-pay and independent-expenditure-pay separately -- never a single win rate, and never counted as a win for uncontested or write-in races.
| Committee | Paid | Payments | Cycles |
|---|---|---|---|
| Spanberger For Congress | $930 | 9 | 2024 |
| Dccc | $251,392 | 6 | 2024 |
| Brittany For The People | $661 | 3 | 2022 |
| Dccc | $3,921 | 2 | 2020 |
| Swing Left | $15,258 | 2 | 2020 |
| Dccc | $52,835 | 2 | 2022 |
| Swing Left | $31,151 | 2 | 2022 |
| Swing Left | $12,720 | 2 | 2024 |
Disbursements from each committee to this vendor.
| Vendor | Shared committees | Lift |
|---|---|---|
| Sprout Social | 3 | 261.7x |
| Financial Innovations, Inc. | 3 | 204.1x |
| Scale To Win | 3 | 22.8x |
| Gusto | 3 | 15.8x |
| United Airlines | 3 | 9.6x |
| Amalgamated Bank | 3 | 7.5x |
Other vendors this vendor's clients hire far more than base rate — lift = how many times more likely a client of this vendor is to also use that vendor, vs. all committees that paid an FEC vendor. Pairs sharing fewer than 3 committees are dropped (too little data for a reliable lift). Money-dark: shared-committee count and lift, not dollars.
Vendor disbursement recipient · corrected FEC disbursement data.