elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Paychex

vendor

NASHVILLE, TN

000,001

10 committees paid them1,066 payments

Active cycles: 2022,2020,2018,2016,2014,2012,2010,2008,2006,2004

Committees served / cycle

Revenue concentration

leverage · by revenue
34.8%
top client · Cooper For Congress
69.0%
top 3 clients
100.0%
top 10 clients
Concentrated
the top 3 clients dominate this vendor's revenue
Cooper For Congress 34.8%
Cooper For Congress 29.7%
Cooper For Congress 4.5%
Marsha For Senate 23.6%
Golden For Congress 3.6%
Tennessee Democratic Party 2.0%
Tennessee Democratic Party 1.5%
Tennessee Democratic Party 0.2%

Each client's share of this vendor's total revenue (disbursement dollars). The "captured vendor" signal — how dependent a vendor is on its largest clients.

Clients' race outcomes

not yet available

Race-by-race outcomes for this vendor's clients aren't shown yet -- they need election results data (by office, cycle, and stage) joined to the FEC/TEC candidates this vendor was paid by, which isn't wired into the warehouse yet. When it lands, this section will show three separate counts (by race, dollar-weighted, and competitive-races-only) for campaign-pay and independent-expenditure-pay separately -- never a single win rate, and never counted as a win for uncontested or write-in races.

CommitteePaidPaymentsCycles
Cooper For Congress $217,753 85 2018
Cooper For Congress $186,197 75 2020
Cooper For Congress $28,210 62 2022
Marsha For Senate $148,055 43 2018
Golden For Congress $22,716 26 2018
Tennessee Democratic Party $12,678 19 2018
Tennessee Democratic Party $9,283 15 2022
Tennessee Democratic Party $1,359 3 2020

Disbursements from each committee to this vendor.

Frequent collaborators

ranked by lift · vendors paid by the same committees
VendorShared committeesLift
Actblue Technical Services 3 3.9x

Other vendors this vendor's clients hire far more than base rate — lift = how many times more likely a client of this vendor is to also use that vendor, vs. all committees that paid an FEC vendor. Pairs sharing fewer than 3 committees are dropped (too little data for a reliable lift). Money-dark: shared-committee count and lift, not dollars.

Vendor disbursement recipient · corrected FEC disbursement data.