elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Gaglers Inc.

vendor

WALNUT, CA

ADVERTISE,OVERHEAD,OTHER,001,007,003,24E,004

15 committees paid them195 payments

Active cycles: 2024,2022,2020,2018,2016

Committees served / cycle

Revenue concentration

leverage · by revenue
5.2%
11.5%
top 3 clients
100.0%
top 10 clients
Balanced
moderate client concentration
Josh Harder For Congress 5.2%
Natalia Linos For Congress 4.8%
Josh Harder For Congress 1.4%
Pat Hackett For Congress 1.1%
Sevigny For Congress 3.0%
Tom Wells For Congress 20.2%
Zina Spezakis For Congress 25.7%
Tom Wells For Congress 14.3%

Each client's share of this vendor's total revenue (disbursement dollars). The "captured vendor" signal — how dependent a vendor is on its largest clients.

Clients' race outcomes

not yet available

Race-by-race outcomes for this vendor's clients aren't shown yet -- they need election results data (by office, cycle, and stage) joined to the FEC/TEC candidates this vendor was paid by, which isn't wired into the warehouse yet. When it lands, this section will show three separate counts (by race, dollar-weighted, and competitive-races-only) for campaign-pay and independent-expenditure-pay separately -- never a single win rate, and never counted as a win for uncontested or write-in races.

CommitteePaidPaymentsCycles
Josh Harder For Congress $1,825 72 2024
Natalia Linos For Congress $1,684 26 2020
Josh Harder For Congress $500 17 2018
Pat Hackett For Congress $375 6 2018
Sevigny For Congress $1,050 5 2018
Tom Wells For Congress $7,050 4 2022
Zina Spezakis For Congress $9,000 2 2020
Tom Wells For Congress $5,000 2 2020
Janessa Goldbeck For Congress $4,500 1 2020
Friends Of McCormick $4,000 1 2020

Disbursements from each committee to this vendor.

Frequent collaborators

ranked by lift · vendors paid by the same committees
VendorShared committeesLift
Mailchimp 3 9.0x
Google 3 5.6x
Facebook 3 4.7x
Actblue Technical Services 3 1.9x

Other vendors this vendor's clients hire far more than base rate — lift = how many times more likely a client of this vendor is to also use that vendor, vs. all committees that paid an FEC vendor. Pairs sharing fewer than 3 committees are dropped (too little data for a reliable lift). Money-dark: shared-committee count and lift, not dollars.

Vendor disbursement recipient · corrected FEC disbursement data.