elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Uhs Premium Billing

vendor

CHICAGO, IL

OVERHEAD,001,SALARIES

6 committees paid them54 payments

Active cycles: 2022,2020,2018

Committees served / cycle

Revenue concentration

leverage · by revenue
33.8%
98.5%
top 3 clients
100.0%
top 10 clients
Concentrated
the top 3 clients dominate this vendor's revenue
Raybould For Us Senate 33.8%
Donna Democrats 57.9%
Connecticut Republican State Central Committee, Inc. 6.8%
McCready For Congress 1.5%

Each client's share of this vendor's total revenue (disbursement dollars). The "captured vendor" signal — how dependent a vendor is on its largest clients.

Clients' race outcomes

not yet available

Race-by-race outcomes for this vendor's clients aren't shown yet -- they need election results data (by office, cycle, and stage) joined to the FEC/TEC candidates this vendor was paid by, which isn't wired into the warehouse yet. When it lands, this section will show three separate counts (by race, dollar-weighted, and competitive-races-only) for campaign-pay and independent-expenditure-pay separately -- never a single win rate, and never counted as a win for uncontested or write-in races.

CommitteePaidPaymentsCycles
Raybould For Us Senate $12,275 7 2018
Donna Democrats $21,024 3 2018
Connecticut Republican State Central Committee, Inc. $2,451 2 2022
McCready For Congress $534 1 2018

Disbursements from each committee to this vendor.

Frequent collaborators

ranked by lift · vendors paid by the same committees
VendorShared committeesLift
Clarke & Sampson, Inc. 3 288.9x
Mba Consulting Group 3 29.2x
Amalgamated Bank 3 11.2x
American Airlines 3 10.6x
Actblue Technical Services 3 3.9x

Other vendors this vendor's clients hire far more than base rate — lift = how many times more likely a client of this vendor is to also use that vendor, vs. all committees that paid an FEC vendor. Pairs sharing fewer than 3 committees are dropped (too little data for a reliable lift). Money-dark: shared-committee count and lift, not dollars.

Vendor disbursement recipient · corrected FEC disbursement data.