ALPHARETTA, GA
001
Active cycles: 2024,2022,2020,2018,2016,2014,2012,2010,2008,2006
Committees served / cycle
Each client's share of this vendor's total revenue (disbursement dollars). The "captured vendor" signal — how dependent a vendor is on its largest clients.
Race-by-race outcomes for this vendor's clients aren't shown yet -- they need election results data (by office, cycle, and stage) joined to the FEC/TEC candidates this vendor was paid by, which isn't wired into the warehouse yet. When it lands, this section will show three separate counts (by race, dollar-weighted, and competitive-races-only) for campaign-pay and independent-expenditure-pay separately -- never a single win rate, and never counted as a win for uncontested or write-in races.
| Committee | Paid | Payments | Cycles |
|---|---|---|---|
| Schatz For Senate | $31,867 | 154 | 2024 |
| Schatz For Senate | $110,696 | 152 | 2022 |
| Schatz For Senate | $19,283 | 97 | 2020 |
| Schatz For Senate | $7,634 | 39 | 2018 |
| Pennsylvania Democratic Party | $8,228 | 27 | 2020 |
| Pennsylvania Democratic Party | $5,774 | 26 | 2018 |
| Pennsylvania Democratic Party | $7,179 | 22 | 2022 |
| Arizona Democratic Party | $3,399 | 7 | 2020 |
| Building Foundations & Landmark Opportunities Pac (Bflo Pac) | $695 | 7 | 2018 |
| Arizona Democratic Party | $451 | 3 | 2022 |
Disbursements from each committee to this vendor.
| Vendor | Shared committees | Lift |
|---|---|---|
| Actblue Technical Services | 4 | 5.1x |
Other vendors this vendor's clients hire far more than base rate — lift = how many times more likely a client of this vendor is to also use that vendor, vs. all committees that paid an FEC vendor. Pairs sharing fewer than 3 committees are dropped (too little data for a reliable lift). Money-dark: shared-committee count and lift, not dollars.
Vendor disbursement recipient · corrected FEC disbursement data.