elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Break Blue Strategies

vendor

SHORELINE, WA

001,002

5 committees paid them10 payments

Active cycles: 2024,2022

Committees served / cycle

Revenue concentration

leverage · by revenue
25.2%
top client · Natasha Hill
77.9%
top 3 clients
100.0%
top 10 clients
Concentrated
the top 3 clients dominate this vendor's revenue
Natasha Hill 25.2%
Bbvf 32.5%
Committee To Elect Krystal Marx 20.2%
Dotv Pac Federal 7.1%
Friends Of Brad Boyd 9.3%
Bbvf 5.7%

Each client's share of this vendor's total revenue (disbursement dollars). The "captured vendor" signal — how dependent a vendor is on its largest clients.

Clients' race outcomes

not yet available

Race-by-race outcomes for this vendor's clients aren't shown yet -- they need election results data (by office, cycle, and stage) joined to the FEC/TEC candidates this vendor was paid by, which isn't wired into the warehouse yet. When it lands, this section will show three separate counts (by race, dollar-weighted, and competitive-races-only) for campaign-pay and independent-expenditure-pay separately -- never a single win rate, and never counted as a win for uncontested or write-in races.

CommitteePaidPaymentsCycles
Natasha Hill $8,918 3 2022
Bbvf $11,475 3 2022
Committee To Elect Krystal Marx $7,147 1 2022
Dotv Pac Federal $2,500 1 2022
Friends Of Brad Boyd $3,300 1 2024
Bbvf $2,000 1 2024

Disbursements from each committee to this vendor.

Frequent collaborators

ranked by lift · vendors paid by the same committees
VendorShared committeesLift
Lo, Andy 3 327.5x
C2G Strategies 3 154.6x
Integrated Solutions: Political 6 16.2x
Gusto 4 11.5x
Actblue Technical Services 8 3.7x

Other vendors this vendor's clients hire far more than base rate — lift = how many times more likely a client of this vendor is to also use that vendor, vs. all committees that paid an FEC vendor. Pairs sharing fewer than 3 committees are dropped (too little data for a reliable lift). Money-dark: shared-committee count and lift, not dollars.

Vendor disbursement recipient · corrected FEC disbursement data.