elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Authorize

vendor

SAN FRANCISCO, CA

OTHER,003

7 committees paid them54 payments

Active cycles: 2022,2020,2016,2014

Committees served / cycle

Revenue concentration

leverage · by revenue
24.2%
top client · Romanoff For Colorado
65.4%
top 3 clients
100.0%
top 10 clients
Concentrated
the top 3 clients dominate this vendor's revenue
Romanoff For Colorado 24.2%
Hoosiers For Hale 23.8%
Margaret Good For Congress 17.5%
Jeff Merkley For Oregon 9.1%
Cynthia Wallace For Congress 22.6%
Hoosiers For Hale 2.8%

Each client's share of this vendor's total revenue (disbursement dollars). The "captured vendor" signal — how dependent a vendor is on its largest clients.

Clients' race outcomes

not yet available

Race-by-race outcomes for this vendor's clients aren't shown yet -- they need election results data (by office, cycle, and stage) joined to the FEC/TEC candidates this vendor was paid by, which isn't wired into the warehouse yet. When it lands, this section will show three separate counts (by race, dollar-weighted, and competitive-races-only) for campaign-pay and independent-expenditure-pay separately -- never a single win rate, and never counted as a win for uncontested or write-in races.

CommitteePaidPaymentsCycles
Romanoff For Colorado $301 10 2020
Hoosiers For Hale $295 7 2020
Margaret Good For Congress $217 6 2020
Jeff Merkley For Oregon $114 4 2020
Cynthia Wallace For Congress $281 1 2020
Hoosiers For Hale $35 1 2022

Disbursements from each committee to this vendor.

Frequent collaborators

ranked by lift · vendors paid by the same committees
VendorShared committeesLift
Amalgamated Bank 3 15.5x
Ngp Van 3 10.8x
Google 3 9.0x
Actblue Technical Services 4 4.1x

Other vendors this vendor's clients hire far more than base rate — lift = how many times more likely a client of this vendor is to also use that vendor, vs. all committees that paid an FEC vendor. Pairs sharing fewer than 3 committees are dropped (too little data for a reliable lift). Money-dark: shared-committee count and lift, not dollars.

Vendor disbursement recipient · corrected FEC disbursement data.