elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Steel City Stonewall Democrats

vendor

PITTSBURGH, PA

001

2 committees paid them2 payments

Active cycles: 2018,2016

Committees served / cycle

Revenue concentration

leverage · by revenue
34.5%
65.5%
top 3 clients
100.0%
top 10 clients
Concentrated
the top 3 clients dominate this vendor's revenue
Human Rights Campaign Pac 34.5%
Tom Prigg For Congress 10.3%
Bob Casey For Senate Inc 20.7%
Fetterman For Pa 17.2%
Conor Lamb For Senate 17.2%

Each client's share of this vendor's total revenue (disbursement dollars). The "captured vendor" signal — how dependent a vendor is on its largest clients.

Clients' race outcomes

not yet available

Race-by-race outcomes for this vendor's clients aren't shown yet -- they need election results data (by office, cycle, and stage) joined to the FEC/TEC candidates this vendor was paid by, which isn't wired into the warehouse yet. When it lands, this section will show three separate counts (by race, dollar-weighted, and competitive-races-only) for campaign-pay and independent-expenditure-pay separately -- never a single win rate, and never counted as a win for uncontested or write-in races.

CommitteePaidPaymentsCycles
Human Rights Campaign Pac $500 1 2018
Tom Prigg For Congress $150 1 2018
Bob Casey For Senate Inc $300 1 2024
Fetterman For Pa $250 1 2022
Conor Lamb For Senate $250 1 2022

Disbursements from each committee to this vendor.

Frequent collaborators

ranked by lift · vendors paid by the same committees
VendorShared committeesLift
Commonwealth Press 3 720.5x
Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania 3 720.5x
Usps 3 211.2x
Elias Law Group 3 27.5x
Actblue Technical Services 3 3.1x

Other vendors this vendor's clients hire far more than base rate — lift = how many times more likely a client of this vendor is to also use that vendor, vs. all committees that paid an FEC vendor. Pairs sharing fewer than 3 committees are dropped (too little data for a reliable lift). Money-dark: shared-committee count and lift, not dollars.

Vendor disbursement recipient · corrected FEC disbursement data.