WASHINGTON, DC
Active cycles: 2024,2022,2020,2018
Committees served / cycle
Each client's share of this vendor's total revenue (disbursement dollars). The "captured vendor" signal — how dependent a vendor is on its largest clients.
Race-by-race outcomes for this vendor's clients aren't shown yet -- they need election results data (by office, cycle, and stage) joined to the FEC/TEC candidates this vendor was paid by, which isn't wired into the warehouse yet. When it lands, this section will show three separate counts (by race, dollar-weighted, and competitive-races-only) for campaign-pay and independent-expenditure-pay separately -- never a single win rate, and never counted as a win for uncontested or write-in races.
| Committee | Paid | Payments | Cycles |
|---|---|---|---|
| Committee To Protect Health Care Pac | $1,542 | 5 | 2020 |
| Committee To Protect Health Care Pac | $1,928 | 5 | 2022 |
| The Progressive List | $3,549 | 3 | 2022 |
| Voters First Victory Fund | $6,408 | 3 | 2024 |
| Golden State Progress | $1,578 | 2 | 2018 |
| Change California Now | $4,050 | 2 | 2018 |
| Change California Now | $1,332 | 2 | 2020 |
| Change California Now | $3,047 | 2 | 2022 |
| Voters First Victory Fund | $1,214 | 2 | 2022 |
| Voters First Victory Fund | $1,084 | 1 | 2020 |
| Committee To Protect Health Care Pac | $119 | 1 | 2024 |
Disbursements from each committee to this vendor.
| Vendor | Shared committees | Lift |
|---|---|---|
| Actblue Technical Services | 3 | 3.1x |
Other vendors this vendor's clients hire far more than base rate — lift = how many times more likely a client of this vendor is to also use that vendor, vs. all committees that paid an FEC vendor. Pairs sharing fewer than 3 committees are dropped (too little data for a reliable lift). Money-dark: shared-committee count and lift, not dollars.
Vendor disbursement recipient · corrected FEC disbursement data.