elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Lafazan, Joshua

candidate · H2NY03162
Lafazan, Joshua NY · DEM · House · NY-03 · open-seat
The seat — demographics, elections & money for this district full page ↗

Person: Lafazan, Joshua · every race, every cycle

cycle 20242022
2 cycles1 committees3 contributing committees107 vendors

Raised — contributing committees / cycle

Spent — vendor payments / cycle

IE support — independent expenditures for this candidate / cycle

Transferred out — other candidates funded / cycle

All four, combined -- 2016-2028

20162028
Raised Spent IE support Transferred out

2016–2028 · entity counts (money-dark); dollar trends light up at the flip. "Raised" is committee-routed contributions only — individual donors stay held pending the privacy decision, and there is no distinct bundler surface yet (#2488).

In this race

2024

DEM · primary contest (7 filers, order not yet known)

Candidate Status Cash on hand Contributing committees Raised / cycle Spent / cycle IE support / cycle Transferred / cycle
Lafazan, Joshua (this candidate) open-seat 5
Cheng, Austin Franklin open-seat
Kaplan, Anna open-seat 1
Livingston, Scott open-seat 1
Malamed, Zak open-seat 3
Murphy, William open-seat 2
Suozzi, Thomas incumbent 477

REP · primary contest (9 filers, order not yet known)

Candidate Status Cash on hand Contributing committees Raised / cycle Spent / cycle IE support / cycle Transferred / cycle
Cotter, William Biddle open-seat
Curry, Kellen open-seat 9
Hach, Gregory open-seat
Lipetri, Mike open-seat 49
Ludwig, Thomas Charles open-seat
Norber, Daniel open-seat
Pilip, Mazi Melesa open-seat 82
Sapraicone, Michael open-seat 1
Toes, Jim Mr. open-seat

Every candidate on file for this race. A party with more than one filer is a live primary contest -- who becomes that party's nominee isn't in the data yet. Cash on hand is the official FEC filing figure, as of the filing's own coverage date -- not a live estimate. The remaining columns are money-dark proxies (counts, not dollars); a dash means no data on file for that candidate yet. Click a column heading to sort.

Campaign contact

WOODBURY, NY, 11797

Website, phone and social accounts arrive with the campaign-contact ingest (FEC F1 + social sources).

Money raised vs spent

coming

Raised-vs-spent over time — the per-cycle totals surface is coming.

Where the money comes from

by source type

Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed) 99% · PACs 1%

Source typeContributionsAmount
Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed)3375$1,668,853
PACs6$20,000
Total (committee-sourced)$1,688,853

Money received from committees, split by the type of the paying committee (PAC, Super PAC, party, joint-fundraising, conduit). Individual (person) giving is aggregated separately with privacy suppression and is not included here.

Individual-donor conduit dependency

lifetime

72% by dollars

3520 of 4420 individual contributions on file routed through a conduit, lifetime -- not per-cycle (the underlying edge source can't be cleanly split by year). Conduit dollars are the true donor's money, passed through a platform; not double-counted.

PAC vs. individual money

by dollars

Individual (direct) 76% · Committee-routed (PAC / party / JFA / conduit) 24%

4420 individual contributions to this candidate's principal committee vs 3381 committee-routed contributions across every committee this candidate has authorized ($5,364,802 vs $1,688,853). Two different grains -- individual money is scoped to the principal committee only; committee-routed money spans every authorized committee -- combined here as the closest count-first read of PAC- vs individual-dependence available today. Part of the funding-concentration strip (#2730); donor-sector concentration and top-vendor share are not yet available.

Where the money goes

beneficiaries

Money disbursed by this candidate's principal committee: contributions to other candidates (the "raises big, then funds allies" signal), transfers to committees by destination type, vendor spending, and independent expenditures made.

Where the donors are

precinct-floored · suppressed
Partial data. About 15% of donor money is geocoded, concentrated in 9 states (AK, AL, AR, AZ, CO, CT, DC, DE, FL). Every other state — including the largest donor states (CA, NY, TX) — currently has zero geocoded rows. A blank state means not yet geocoded, never no donors here. Not a complete picture of donor geography.
Loading…

Aggregated itemized individual giving, geocoded to donor home address, suppressed for privacy (small or single-donor-dominated cells withheld). Unitemized giving has no geography.

Who runs it

Treasurer · LEIBSON, ALEX

Board / senior staff arrive from the payroll-disbursement derivation.

Committees

authorized
CommitteeRoleType
Lafazan For Congress Principal campaign committee H

Money in

committee & PAC contributions

Contributing committees & PACs · 2024:

Committee / PACContributedContributionsCycles
ActblueActBlue · conduit $459,571 836 2024
No Labels Pac $5,000 1 2024
Ua Union Plumbers & Pipefitters Vote! Pac (United Association Of Journeymen And Apprentices Of The Plumbing & Pipefitting Industry Of The United States And Canada) $-1,000 1 2024

Committee & PAC contributions to this candidate. Individual donors remain held (donor-privacy decision).

Conduit dependency

via ActBlue / WinRed

100% of committee-routed contributions to this candidate (2024) arrive through conduit infrastructure — 836 of 838 contributions · 99% of dollars ($459,571).

ConduitAmount
ActBlue$459,571

Conduits (ActBlue, WinRed) are passthroughs — individuals give through them to candidates. This is the share of committee-routed contributions flowing over that infrastructure. Donor-level pass-through to the ultimate recipient is tracked separately (in progress).

Cross-party support

who funds both sides

2 of this candidate's 5 top committee funders also fund the other side.

Committee / PACOverall givingD / R
No Labels Pac 50% / 50%
American Crystal Sugar Company Political Action Committee 54% / 46%

Each committee's overall giving split by recipient party (by dollars).

Super PAC spending

$ held · counts

No independent expenditures on file for 2024 (2016 excluded).

Money out — top vendors

$ shown
VendorPaidPaymentsCategory
Actblue Technical Services $48,042 73
Actblue Technical Services $18,106 44
Uber Technologies $456 25
Amazon $1,374 23
Gusto $27,644 20
Intuit $1,116 19
Katz Compliance Llc $36,878 16
Amalgamated Bank $2,085 15
Tucker Green $401,573 13
Mta $227 13
Ngp Van $21,562 12
Mandate Media $64,665 12

Payment counts from the principal committee; dollar totals held. Arc maps of where money goes arrive with the geo layer.

Right of response

No response on file. The subject of this page may add a statement here.

Is this you? Claim this page to respond. Statements are the subject's own words, verified and moderated — the underlying data is unchanged.

One-stop candidate summary · money-dark until the corrected-financial refresh. Data as of March 11, 2026, 11 a.m..