Jimmy Gomez

candidate · H7CA34011

Jimmy Gomez · — · —

cycle 2026 2024 2022 2020 2018 2016

6 cycles0 committees2 contributing committees— vendors

Raised — contributing committees / cycle

IE support — independent expenditures for this candidate / cycle

All four, combined -- 2016-2028

Raised IE support

2016–2028 · entity counts (money-dark); dollar trends light up at the flip. "Raised" is committee-routed contributions only — individual donors stay held pending the privacy decision, and there is no distinct bundler surface yet (#2488).

Campaign contact

Website, phone and social accounts arrive with the campaign-contact ingest (FEC F1 + social sources).

Money raised vs spent

coming

Raised-vs-spent over time — the per-cycle totals surface is coming.

Where the money comes from

by source type

● Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed) 64% · ● PACs 36%

Source type	Contributions	Amount
Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed)	4203	$754,892
PACs	402	$424,385
Total (committee-sourced)		$1,179,277

Money received from committees, split by the type of the paying committee (PAC, Super PAC, party, joint-fundraising, conduit). Individual (person) giving is aggregated separately with privacy suppression and is not included here.

Where the donors are

precinct-floored · suppressed

Partial data. About 15% of donor money is geocoded, concentrated in 9 states (AK, AL, AR, AZ, CO, CT, DC, DE, FL). Every other state — including the largest donor states (CA, NY, TX) — currently has zero geocoded rows. A blank state means not yet geocoded, never no donors here. Not a complete picture of donor geography.

Loading…

Aggregated itemized individual giving, geocoded to donor home address, suppressed for privacy (small or single-donor-dominated cells withheld). Unitemized giving has no geography.

Who runs it

Board / senior staff arrive from the payroll-disbursement derivation.

Committees

authorized

No authorized committees on file.

Money in

committee & PAC contributions

Contributing committees & PACs · 2016:

No committee contributions on file for this cycle.

Cross-party support

who funds both sides

29 of this candidate's 40 top committee funders also fund the other side.

Committee / PAC	Overall giving	D / R
Centene Corporation Political Action Committee (Centene Pac)		50% / 50%
Honeywell International Political Action Committee		50% / 50%
Medtronic Inc. Pac		50% / 50%
National Association Of Realtors Political Action Committee		50% / 50%
America'S Credit Unions Pac Of Credit Union National Association, Inc.		51% / 49%
Teachers Insurance Annuity Association Of America Pac (Tiaa Pac)		51% / 49%
American Express Company Political Action Committee (Axppac)		48% / 52%
Gridiron-Pac		52% / 48%
Intel Corporation Political Action Committee (Ipac)		48% / 52%
National Association Of Broadcasters Political Action Committee (Nabpac)		48% / 52%
National Beer Wholesalers Association Political Action Committee		48% / 52%
American Physical Therapy Association Physical Therapy Political Action Committee (Pt-Pac)		53% / 47%

Each committee's overall giving split by recipient party (by dollars).

Super PAC spending

outside money

Supporting: 1 committee · 1 expenditure · $67 · Opposing: 0 · 0 · —

Committee	Stance	Amount
Nea Advocacy Fund	supports	$67

Independent expenditures for or against this candidate. 2016 excluded (known IE undercount).

0% of this candidate's receipts + outside spending is outside money (independent expenditures for/against, as a share of receipts plus outside spending).

Money out — top vendors

$ shown

No vendor disbursements on file.

Right of response

No response on file. The subject of this page may add a statement here.

Is this you? Claim this page to respond. Statements are the subject's own words, verified and moderated — the underlying data is unchanged.

One-stop candidate summary · money-dark until the corrected-financial refresh. Data as of Aug. 17, 2026, 7:40 p.m..