elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Larson, John B

candidate · H8CT01046
Larson, John B CT · DEM · House · CT-01 · incumbent
The seat — demographics, elections & money for this district full page ↗

Person: Larson, John B · every race, every cycle

15 cycles1 committees213 contributing committees680 vendors

Raised — contributing committees / cycle

Spent — vendor payments / cycle

IE support — independent expenditures for this candidate / cycle

Transferred out — other candidates funded / cycle

All four, combined -- 2016-2028

20162028
Raised Spent IE support Transferred out

2016–2028 · entity counts (money-dark); dollar trends light up at the flip. "Raised" is committee-routed contributions only — individual donors stay held pending the privacy decision, and there is no distinct bundler surface yet (#2488).

Campaign contact

EAST HARTFORD, CT, 06108

Website, phone and social accounts arrive with the campaign-contact ingest (FEC F1 + social sources).

Money raised vs spent

coming

Raised-vs-spent over time — the per-cycle totals surface is coming.

Where the money comes from

by source type

PACs 85% · Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed) 15% · Super PACs 0%

Source typeContributionsAmount
PACs1918$3,564,472
Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed)4414$621,528
Super PACs5$7,500
Total (committee-sourced)$4,193,501

Money received from committees, split by the type of the paying committee (PAC, Super PAC, party, joint-fundraising, conduit). Individual (person) giving is aggregated separately with privacy suppression and is not included here.

Individual-donor conduit dependency

lifetime

22% by dollars

4969 of 23301 individual contributions on file routed through a conduit, lifetime -- not per-cycle (the underlying edge source can't be cleanly split by year). Conduit dollars are the true donor's money, passed through a platform; not double-counted.

PAC vs. individual money

by dollars

Individual (direct) 77% · Committee-routed (PAC / party / JFA / conduit) 23%

23301 individual contributions to this candidate's principal committee vs 6337 committee-routed contributions across every committee this candidate has authorized ($14,416,098 vs $4,193,501). Two different grains -- individual money is scoped to the principal committee only; committee-routed money spans every authorized committee -- combined here as the closest count-first read of PAC- vs individual-dependence available today. Part of the funding-concentration strip (#2730); donor-sector concentration and top-vendor share are not yet available.

Where the money goes

beneficiaries

Money disbursed by this candidate's principal committee: contributions to other candidates (the "raises big, then funds allies" signal), transfers to committees by destination type, vendor spending, and independent expenditures made.

Where the donors are

precinct-floored · suppressed
Partial data. About 15% of donor money is geocoded, concentrated in 9 states (AK, AL, AR, AZ, CO, CT, DC, DE, FL). Every other state — including the largest donor states (CA, NY, TX) — currently has zero geocoded rows. A blank state means not yet geocoded, never no donors here. Not a complete picture of donor geography.
Loading…

Aggregated itemized individual giving, geocoded to donor home address, suppressed for privacy (small or single-donor-dominated cells withheld). Unitemized giving has no geography.

Who runs it

Treasurer · FELDMAN, BARRY

Board / senior staff arrive from the payroll-disbursement derivation.

Committees

authorized
CommitteeRoleType
Larson For Congress Principal campaign committee H

Money in

committee & PAC contributions

Contributing committees & PACs · 2026:

No committee contributions on file for this cycle.

Cross-party support

who funds both sides

36 of this candidate's 40 top committee funders also fund the other side.

Committee / PACOverall givingD / R
American Council Of Life Insurers Political Action Committee 50% / 50%
Honeywell International Political Action Committee 50% / 50%
National Association Of Realtors Political Action Committee 50% / 50%
Aflac Political Action Committee (Aflac Pac) 51% / 49%
American Academy Of Dermatology Association Political Action Committee (Skinpac) 51% / 49%
Employees Of Northrop Grumman Corporation Pac 49% / 51%
Pricewaterhousecoopers Political Action Committee I 49% / 51%
National Beer Wholesalers Association Political Action Committee 48% / 52%
The Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Company Political Action Committee (Nmpac) 48% / 52%
Cox Enterprises Pac (Coxpac) Inc. 47% / 53%
Insured Retirement Institute Political Action Committee (Iri Pac) 53% / 47%
New York Life Insurance Company Political Action Committee 47% / 53%

Each committee's overall giving split by recipient party (by dollars).

Super PAC spending

$ held · counts

No independent expenditures on file for 2026 (2016 excluded).

Money out — top vendors

$ shown
VendorPaidPaymentsCategory
Paychex Of New York, Llc $140,903 224
Paychex Of New York, Llc $92,060 219
Paychex Of New York, Llc $59,621 131
Christiana, Linda $17,269 103
Christiana, Linda $13,938 103
Barnes, Joshua E. $103,847 103
Actblue Technical Services $13,051 101
Actblue Technical Services $14,607 98
Wang, George P. $26,183 74
Feldman, Barry $44,490 67
Christiana, Linda $8,832 65
Paychex Of New York, Llc $31,098 60

Payment counts from the principal committee; dollar totals held. Arc maps of where money goes arrive with the geo layer.

Right of response

No response on file. The subject of this page may add a statement here.

Is this you? Claim this page to respond. Statements are the subject's own words, verified and moderated — the underlying data is unchanged.

One-stop candidate summary · money-dark until the corrected-financial refresh. Data as of March 11, 2026, 11 a.m..