elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Case, Ed

candidate · H8HI01234
Case, Ed · — · —
4 cycles0 committees8 contributing committees vendors

Raised — contributing committees / cycle

IE support — independent expenditures for this candidate / cycle

All four, combined -- 2016-2028

20162028
Raised IE support

2016–2028 · entity counts (money-dark); dollar trends light up at the flip. "Raised" is committee-routed contributions only — individual donors stay held pending the privacy decision, and there is no distinct bundler surface yet (#2488).

Campaign contact

Website, phone and social accounts arrive with the campaign-contact ingest (FEC F1 + social sources).

Money raised vs spent

coming

Raised-vs-spent over time — the per-cycle totals surface is coming.

Where the money comes from

by source type

Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed) 89% · PACs 11%

Source typeContributionsAmount
Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed)622$183,464
PACs18$22,300
Total (committee-sourced)$205,764

Money received from committees, split by the type of the paying committee (PAC, Super PAC, party, joint-fundraising, conduit). Individual (person) giving is aggregated separately with privacy suppression and is not included here.

Where the donors are

precinct-floored · suppressed
Partial data. About 15% of donor money is geocoded, concentrated in 9 states (AK, AL, AR, AZ, CO, CT, DC, DE, FL). Every other state — including the largest donor states (CA, NY, TX) — currently has zero geocoded rows. A blank state means not yet geocoded, never no donors here. Not a complete picture of donor geography.
Loading…

Aggregated itemized individual giving, geocoded to donor home address, suppressed for privacy (small or single-donor-dominated cells withheld). Unitemized giving has no geography.

Who runs it

Board / senior staff arrive from the payroll-disbursement derivation.

Committees

authorized

No authorized committees on file.

Money in

committee & PAC contributions

Contributing committees & PACs · 2018:

Committee / PACContributedContributionsCycles
ActblueActBlue · conduit $77,381 238 2018
Hawaiian Airlines Inc Political Action Committee $2,000 2 2018
Inland Empire Strikes Pac; The $0 2 2018
Democrats Reshaping America (Dreampac) $0 2 2018
American Medical Association Political Action Committee $2,500 1 2018
Build Political Action Committee Of The National Association Of Home Builders (Buildpac) $5,000 1 2018
Committee For Leadership And Progress $1,000 1 2018
International Franchise Association Franchising Political Action Committee Inc $1,000 1 2018

Committee & PAC contributions to this candidate. Individual donors remain held (donor-privacy decision).

Conduit dependency

via ActBlue / WinRed

96% of committee-routed contributions to this candidate (2018) arrive through conduit infrastructure — 238 of 248 contributions · 87% of dollars ($77,381).

ConduitAmount
ActBlue$77,381

Conduits (ActBlue, WinRed) are passthroughs — individuals give through them to candidates. This is the share of committee-routed contributions flowing over that infrastructure. Donor-level pass-through to the ultimate recipient is tracked separately (in progress).

Cross-party support

who funds both sides

5 of this candidate's 9 top committee funders also fund the other side.

Committee / PACOverall givingD / R
American Medical Association Political Action Committee 56% / 44%
Hawaiian Airlines Inc Political Action Committee 72% / 28%
International Franchise Association Franchising Political Action Committee Inc 27% / 73%
Build Political Action Committee Of The National Association Of Home Builders (Buildpac) 20% / 80%
National Active And Retired Federal Employees Association Political Action Com (Narfe-Pac) 82% / 18%

Each committee's overall giving split by recipient party (by dollars).

Super PAC spending

outside money

Supporting: 1 committee · 1 expenditure · $10  ·  Opposing: 0 · 0 · —

CommitteeStanceAmount
Sierra Club Political Committee supports $10

Independent expenditures for or against this candidate. 2016 excluded (known IE undercount).

0% of this candidate's receipts + outside spending is outside money (independent expenditures for/against, as a share of receipts plus outside spending).

Money out — top vendors

$ shown

No vendor disbursements on file.

Right of response

No response on file. The subject of this page may add a statement here.

Is this you? Claim this page to respond. Statements are the subject's own words, verified and moderated — the underlying data is unchanged.

One-stop candidate summary · money-dark until the corrected-financial refresh. Data as of Aug. 17, 2026, 7:40 p.m..