Person: Smith, Tina · every race, every cycle
Raised — contributing committees / cycle
Spent — vendor payments / cycle
IE support — independent expenditures for this candidate / cycle
Transferred out — other candidates funded / cycle
All four, combined -- 2016-2028
2016–2028 · entity counts (money-dark); dollar trends light up at the flip. "Raised" is committee-routed contributions only — individual donors stay held pending the privacy decision, and there is no distinct bundler surface yet (#2488).
| Candidate | Status | Cash on hand | Contributing committees | Raised / cycle | Spent / cycle | IE support / cycle | Transferred / cycle |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Smith, Tina (this candidate) | incumbent | — | 436 |
| Candidate | Status | Cash on hand | Contributing committees | Raised / cycle | Spent / cycle | IE support / cycle | Transferred / cycle |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| White, Royce | challenger | — | 5 |
Every candidate on file for this race. A party with more than one filer is a live primary contest -- who becomes that party's nominee isn't in the data yet. Cash on hand is the official FEC filing figure, as of the filing's own coverage date -- not a live estimate. The remaining columns are money-dark proxies (counts, not dollars); a dash means no data on file for that candidate yet. Click a column heading to sort.
Smith, Tina ranks #15 of 117 Senate candidates nationally in 2026.
| # | Candidate | State | Party | Raised |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Ossoff, T. Jonathan | GA | DEM | $214,842,226 |
| 2 | Sullivan, Dan | AK | REP | $109,507,676 |
| 3 | Graham, Lindsey O. | SC | REP | $55,788,928 |
| 4 | Peters, Gary | MI | DEM | $42,624,020 |
| 5 | McConnell, Mitch | KY | REP | $41,405,744 |
| 6 | Hickenlooper, John W. | CO | DEM | $40,916,604 |
| 7 | Daines, Steve | MT | REP | $23,656,650 |
| 8 | Booker, Cory A. | NJ | DEM | $22,038,180 |
| 15 | Smith, Tina (this candidate) | MN | DEM | $13,343,738 |
The national Senate field for 2026, ranked by money raised. Party affiliation shown as filed — third-party and state-party labels (DFL, WFP, etc.) are not merged into DEM/REP.
SAINT PAUL, MN, 55114
Website, phone and social accounts arrive with the campaign-contact ingest (FEC F1 + social sources).
Raised-vs-spent over time — the per-cycle totals surface is coming.
● Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed) 83% · ● PACs 17% · ● Super PACs 0%
| Source type | Contributions | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed) | 248432 | $11,002,677 |
| PACs | 1097 | $2,303,258 |
| Super PACs | 12 | $25,530 |
| Total (committee-sourced) | $13,331,464 |
Money received from committees, split by the type of the paying committee (PAC, Super PAC, party, joint-fundraising, conduit). Individual (person) giving is aggregated separately with privacy suppression and is not included here.
| Payer type | Transfers | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Joint-fundraising committees | 24 | $199,076 |
| Total | $199,076 |
Committee-to-committee transfers received by this candidate's principal committee, split by the type of the sending committee.
67% by dollars
116002 of 152566 individual contributions on file routed through a conduit, lifetime -- not per-cycle (the underlying edge source can't be cleanly split by year). Conduit dollars are the true donor's money, passed through a platform; not double-counted.
● Individual (direct) 68% · ● Committee-routed (PAC / party / JFA / conduit) 32%
152566 individual contributions to this candidate's principal committee vs 249541 committee-routed contributions across every committee this candidate has authorized ($27,811,160 vs $13,331,464). Two different grains -- individual money is scoped to the principal committee only; committee-routed money spans every authorized committee -- combined here as the closest count-first read of PAC- vs individual-dependence available today. Part of the funding-concentration strip (#2730); donor-sector concentration and top-vendor share are not yet available.
Money disbursed by this candidate's principal committee: contributions to other candidates (the "raises big, then funds allies" signal), transfers to committees by destination type, vendor spending, and independent expenditures made.
Aggregated itemized individual giving, geocoded to donor home address, suppressed for privacy (small or single-donor-dominated cells withheld). Unitemized giving has no geography.
Treasurer · NELSON, KIMBERLY
Board / senior staff arrive from the payroll-disbursement derivation.
| Committee | Role | Type |
|---|---|---|
| Senate Impact: Mn & Nv | Joint fundraising | S |
| Tina Smith For Minnesota | Principal campaign committee | S |
Contributing committees & PACs · 2026:
No committee contributions on file for this cycle.
35 of this candidate's 40 top committee funders also fund the other side.
Each committee's overall giving split by recipient party (by dollars).
No independent expenditures on file for 2026 (2016 excluded).
| Vendor | Paid | Payments | Category |
|---|---|---|---|
| Usps | $16,828 | 292 | |
| Usps | $6,390 | 216 | |
| Usps | $7,708 | 164 | |
| Usps | $4,988 | 161 | |
| Sunrise Banks | $3,188 | 156 | |
| Sunrise Banks | $3,154 | 156 | |
| Sunrise Banks | $3,077 | 143 | |
| Actblue Technical Services | $258,200 | 128 | |
| Actblue Technical Services | $22,584 | 120 | |
| Actblue Technical Services | $22,422 | 118 | |
| Actblue Technical Services | $111,549 | 112 | |
| Sunrise Banks | $11,539 | 106 |
Payment counts from the principal committee; dollar totals held. Arc maps of where money goes arrive with the geo layer.
No response on file. The subject of this page may add a statement here.
Is this you? Claim this page to respond. Statements are the subject's own words, verified and moderated — the underlying data is unchanged.
One-stop candidate summary · money-dark until the corrected-financial refresh. Data as of March 11, 2026, 11 a.m..