elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

O'Halleran, Tom

candidate · H6AZ01199
O'Halleran, Tom AZ · DEM · House · AZ-02 · incumbent
The seat — demographics, elections & money for this district full page ↗

Person: O'Halleran, Tom · every race, every cycle

5 cycles1 committees27 contributing committees358 vendors

Raised — contributing committees / cycle

Spent — vendor payments / cycle

IE support — independent expenditures for this candidate / cycle

Transferred out — other candidates funded / cycle

All four, combined -- 2016-2028

20162028
Raised Spent IE support Transferred out

2016–2028 · entity counts (money-dark); dollar trends light up at the flip. "Raised" is committee-routed contributions only — individual donors stay held pending the privacy decision, and there is no distinct bundler surface yet (#2488).

In this race

2016

DEM · primary contest (2 filers, order not yet known)

Candidate Status Cash on hand Contributing committees Raised / cycle Spent / cycle IE support / cycle Transferred / cycle
O'Halleran, Tom (this candidate) incumbent 401
Steele, Victoria L challenger 1

REP

Candidate Status Cash on hand Contributing committees Raised / cycle Spent / cycle IE support / cycle Transferred / cycle
McSally, Martha incumbent 244

Every candidate on file for this race. A party with more than one filer is a live primary contest -- who becomes that party's nominee isn't in the data yet. Cash on hand is the official FEC filing figure, as of the filing's own coverage date -- not a live estimate. The remaining columns are money-dark proxies (counts, not dollars); a dash means no data on file for that candidate yet. Click a column heading to sort.

Campaign contact

SEDONA, AZ, 86351

Website, phone and social accounts arrive with the campaign-contact ingest (FEC F1 + social sources).

Money raised vs spent

coming

Raised-vs-spent over time — the per-cycle totals surface is coming.

Where the money comes from

by source type

Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed) 61% · PACs 38% · Party committees 0% · Super PACs 0%

Source typeContributionsAmount
Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed)47892$3,960,372
PACs1542$2,466,601
Party committees80$30,000
Super PACs6$6,250
Total (committee-sourced)$6,463,223

Money received from committees, split by the type of the paying committee (PAC, Super PAC, party, joint-fundraising, conduit). Individual (person) giving is aggregated separately with privacy suppression and is not included here.

Transfers in

from committees
Payer typeTransfersAmount
Joint-fundraising committees18$77,809
Total$77,809

Committee-to-committee transfers received by this candidate's principal committee, split by the type of the sending committee.

Individual-donor conduit dependency

lifetime

75% by dollars

29303 of 32793 individual contributions on file routed through a conduit, lifetime -- not per-cycle (the underlying edge source can't be cleanly split by year). Conduit dollars are the true donor's money, passed through a platform; not double-counted.

PAC vs. individual money

by dollars

Individual (direct) 66% · Committee-routed (PAC / party / JFA / conduit) 34%

32793 individual contributions to this candidate's principal committee vs 49520 committee-routed contributions across every committee this candidate has authorized ($12,315,544 vs $6,463,223). Two different grains -- individual money is scoped to the principal committee only; committee-routed money spans every authorized committee -- combined here as the closest count-first read of PAC- vs individual-dependence available today. Part of the funding-concentration strip (#2730); donor-sector concentration and top-vendor share are not yet available.

Where the money goes

beneficiaries

Money disbursed by this candidate's principal committee: contributions to other candidates (the "raises big, then funds allies" signal), transfers to committees by destination type, vendor spending, and independent expenditures made.

Where the donors are

precinct-floored · suppressed
Partial data. About 15% of donor money is geocoded, concentrated in 9 states (AK, AL, AR, AZ, CO, CT, DC, DE, FL). Every other state — including the largest donor states (CA, NY, TX) — currently has zero geocoded rows. A blank state means not yet geocoded, never no donors here. Not a complete picture of donor geography.
Loading…

Aggregated itemized individual giving, geocoded to donor home address, suppressed for privacy (small or single-donor-dominated cells withheld). Unitemized giving has no geography.

Who runs it

Treasurer · QUINLAN, DJ

Board / senior staff arrive from the payroll-disbursement derivation.

Committees

authorized
CommitteeRoleType
Tom O'Halleran For Congress Principal campaign committee H

Money in

committee & PAC contributions

Contributing committees & PACs · 2016:

No committee contributions on file for this cycle.

Cross-party support

who funds both sides

29 of this candidate's 40 top committee funders also fund the other side.

Committee / PACOverall givingD / R
Honeywell International Political Action Committee 50% / 50%
National Association Of Realtors Political Action Committee 50% / 50%
America'S Credit Unions Pac Of Credit Union National Association, Inc. 51% / 49%
Elevance Health, Inc. Political Action Committee (Elevance Health Pac) 51% / 49%
Employees Of Northrop Grumman Corporation Pac 49% / 51%
Thompson Coburn Political Action Committee 49% / 51%
Verizon Communications, Inc. Political Action Committee (Verizon Pac) 49% / 51%
National Beer Wholesalers Association Political Action Committee 48% / 52%
Abbott Laboratories Employee Political Action Committee 47% / 53%
Cox Enterprises Pac (Coxpac) Inc. 47% / 53%
Employees Of Rtx Corporation Political Action Committee 46% / 54%
At&T Inc. Employee Federal Political Action Committee (At&T Employee Federal Pac) 45% / 55%

Each committee's overall giving split by recipient party (by dollars).

Super PAC spending

outside money

Supporting: 23 committees · 81 expenditures · $1,558,106  ·  Opposing: 10 · 54 · $3,523,846

CommitteeStanceAmount
Feminist Majority supports $2,936
No Labels Action, Inc. supports $379,489
Nrcc opposes $1,728,520
National Association For Gun Rights Inc Pac opposes $2,995
Defend Us Pac opposes $183,799
Nrcc opposes $1,005,069
United We Can supports $19,444
Congressional Leadership Fund opposes $445,589
Working America supports $16,410
Defending Rural Arizona Pac opposes $17,562
The Wilderness Society Action Fund supports $25,167
Women Speak Out Pac opposes $2,272
Moveon.Org Political Action supports $18,731
National Association Of Realtors Political Action Committee supports $59,024
Planned Parenthood Votes supports $140

Independent expenditures for or against this candidate. 2016 excluded (known IE undercount).

44% of this candidate's receipts + outside spending is outside money (independent expenditures for/against, as a share of receipts plus outside spending).

Money out — top vendors

$ shown
VendorPaidPaymentsCategory
Adp Inc $515,386 202
Adp Inc $341,046 192
Actblue Technical Services $73,784 136
Adp Inc $338,999 132
Democracy Engine $7,898 99
Actblue Technical Services $35,051 76
Democracy Engine $4,768 73
Google, Inc $1,349 52
American Airlines $15,767 42
Facebook $11,472 42
Zoom Inc $1,634 35
National Democratic Club $2,921 33

Payment counts from the principal committee; dollar totals held. Arc maps of where money goes arrive with the geo layer.

Right of response

No response on file. The subject of this page may add a statement here.

Is this you? Claim this page to respond. Statements are the subject's own words, verified and moderated — the underlying data is unchanged.

One-stop candidate summary · money-dark until the corrected-financial refresh. Data as of March 11, 2026, 11 a.m..