elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Galan-Woods, Marlene

candidate · H4AZ01228
Galan-Woods, Marlene AZ · DEM · House · AZ-01 · challenger
The seat — demographics, elections & money for this district full page ↗

Person: Galan-Woods, Marlene · every race, every cycle

cycle 2024
1 cycles1 committees5 contributing committees49 vendors

Raised — contributing committees / cycle

Spent — vendor payments / cycle

IE support — independent expenditures for this candidate / cycle

Transferred out — other candidates funded / cycle

All four, combined -- 2016-2028

20162028
Raised Spent IE support Transferred out

2016–2028 · entity counts (money-dark); dollar trends light up at the flip. "Raised" is committee-routed contributions only — individual donors stay held pending the privacy decision, and there is no distinct bundler surface yet (#2488).

In this race

2024

DEM · primary contest (6 filers, order not yet known)

Candidate Status Cash on hand Contributing committees Raised / cycle Spent / cycle IE support / cycle Transferred / cycle
Galan-Woods, Marlene (this candidate) challenger 6
Cherny, Andrei challenger 1
Horne, Andrew challenger 1
Kroemer, Kurt challenger 1
O'Callaghan, Conor challenger 1
Shah, Amish Dr. challenger 59

REP · primary contest (3 filers, order not yet known)

Candidate Status Cash on hand Contributing committees Raised / cycle Spent / cycle IE support / cycle Transferred / cycle
Backie, Robert challenger
George, Kimberly challenger
Schweikert, David S. incumbent 576

LIB

Candidate Status Cash on hand Contributing committees Raised / cycle Spent / cycle IE support / cycle Transferred / cycle
Martin, Michelle challenger

Every candidate on file for this race. A party with more than one filer is a live primary contest -- who becomes that party's nominee isn't in the data yet. Cash on hand is the official FEC filing figure, as of the filing's own coverage date -- not a live estimate. The remaining columns are money-dark proxies (counts, not dollars); a dash means no data on file for that candidate yet. Click a column heading to sort.

Campaign contact

PHOENIX, AZ, 85018

Website, phone and social accounts arrive with the campaign-contact ingest (FEC F1 + social sources).

Money raised vs spent

coming

Raised-vs-spent over time — the per-cycle totals surface is coming.

Where the money comes from

by source type

Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed) 99% · PACs 1%

Source typeContributionsAmount
Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed)7183$1,139,999
PACs6$16,000
Total (committee-sourced)$1,155,999

Money received from committees, split by the type of the paying committee (PAC, Super PAC, party, joint-fundraising, conduit). Individual (person) giving is aggregated separately with privacy suppression and is not included here.

Individual-donor conduit dependency

lifetime

91% by dollars

4266 of 4838 individual contributions on file routed through a conduit, lifetime -- not per-cycle (the underlying edge source can't be cleanly split by year). Conduit dollars are the true donor's money, passed through a platform; not double-counted.

PAC vs. individual money

by dollars

Individual (direct) 69% · Committee-routed (PAC / party / JFA / conduit) 31%

4838 individual contributions to this candidate's principal committee vs 7189 committee-routed contributions across every committee this candidate has authorized ($2,543,046 vs $1,155,999). Two different grains -- individual money is scoped to the principal committee only; committee-routed money spans every authorized committee -- combined here as the closest count-first read of PAC- vs individual-dependence available today. Part of the funding-concentration strip (#2730); donor-sector concentration and top-vendor share are not yet available.

Where the money goes

beneficiaries

Money disbursed by this candidate's principal committee: contributions to other candidates (the "raises big, then funds allies" signal), transfers to committees by destination type, vendor spending, and independent expenditures made.

Where the donors are

precinct-floored · suppressed
Partial data. About 15% of donor money is geocoded, concentrated in 9 states (AK, AL, AR, AZ, CO, CT, DC, DE, FL). Every other state — including the largest donor states (CA, NY, TX) — currently has zero geocoded rows. A blank state means not yet geocoded, never no donors here. Not a complete picture of donor geography.
Loading…

Aggregated itemized individual giving, geocoded to donor home address, suppressed for privacy (small or single-donor-dominated cells withheld). Unitemized giving has no geography.

Who runs it

Treasurer · MCINTOSH, ELLEN

Board / senior staff arrive from the payroll-disbursement derivation.

Committees

authorized
CommitteeRoleType
Marlene For Congress Principal campaign committee H

Money in

committee & PAC contributions

Contributing committees & PACs · 2024:

Committee / PACContributedContributionsCycles
ActblueActBlue · conduit $1,139,999 7,183 2024
United Food And Commercial Workers International Union Active Ballot Club $10,000 2 2024
D.R.I.V.E. - Democrat, Republican, Independent Voter Education (The Pac Of The International Brotherhood Of Teamsters) $0 2 2024
Nea Fund For Children And Public Education $5,000 1 2024
American Federation Of Govt. Empl. Political Action Committee $1,000 1 2024

Committee & PAC contributions to this candidate. Individual donors remain held (donor-privacy decision).

Conduit dependency

via ActBlue / WinRed

100% of committee-routed contributions to this candidate (2024) arrive through conduit infrastructure — 7,183 of 7,189 contributions · 99% of dollars ($1,139,999).

ConduitAmount
ActBlue$1,139,999

Conduits (ActBlue, WinRed) are passthroughs — individuals give through them to candidates. This is the share of committee-routed contributions flowing over that infrastructure. Donor-level pass-through to the ultimate recipient is tracked separately (in progress).

Super PAC spending

outside money

Supporting: 3 committees · 8 expenditures · $215,823  ·  Opposing: 0 · 0 · —

CommitteeStanceAmount
Save America Fund supports $183,603
Professional Firefighters For Arizona supports $11,310
Victory Pac supports $20,910

Independent expenditures for or against this candidate. 2016 excluded (known IE undercount).

16% of this candidate's receipts + outside spending is outside money (independent expenditures for/against, as a share of receipts plus outside spending).

Money out — top vendors

$ shown
VendorPaidPaymentsCategory
Actblue Technical Services $34,707 63
Paychex $66,676 44
Payroll Data Processing, Inc. $208,224 43
Al Media $692,312 16
Westwest Digital $129,258 14
Google $1,283 14
Tunlaw Strategies $49,296 11
Amalgamated Bank $2,039 10
Mba Consulting Group $50,087 10
Ngp Van Inc. $24,192 9
Grassroots Analytics, Inc. $3,250 7
Coppersmith Brockelman Plc $4,593 7

Payment counts from the principal committee; dollar totals held. Arc maps of where money goes arrive with the geo layer.

Right of response

No response on file. The subject of this page may add a statement here.

Is this you? Claim this page to respond. Statements are the subject's own words, verified and moderated — the underlying data is unchanged.

One-stop candidate summary · money-dark until the corrected-financial refresh. Data as of March 11, 2026, 11 a.m..