Person: Eshoo, Anna G · every race, every cycle
Raised — contributing committees / cycle
Spent — vendor payments / cycle
IE support — independent expenditures for this candidate / cycle
Transferred out — other candidates funded / cycle
All four, combined -- 2016-2028
2016–2028 · entity counts (money-dark); dollar trends light up at the flip. "Raised" is committee-routed contributions only — individual donors stay held pending the privacy decision, and there is no distinct bundler surface yet (#2488).
DEM · primary contest (2 filers, order not yet known)
| Candidate | Status | Cash on hand | Contributing committees | Raised / cycle | Spent / cycle | IE support / cycle | Transferred / cycle |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eshoo, Anna G (this candidate) | incumbent | — | 306 | ||||
| Lofgren, Zoe | incumbent | — | 218 |
Every candidate on file for this race. A party with more than one filer is a live primary contest -- who becomes that party's nominee isn't in the data yet. Cash on hand is the official FEC filing figure, as of the filing's own coverage date -- not a live estimate. The remaining columns are money-dark proxies (counts, not dollars); a dash means no data on file for that candidate yet. Click a column heading to sort.
SACRAMENTO, CA, 95814
Website, phone and social accounts arrive with the campaign-contact ingest (FEC F1 + social sources).
Raised-vs-spent over time — the per-cycle totals surface is coming.
● Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed) 56% · ● PACs 44% · ● Super PACs 0% · ● Party committees 0%
| Source type | Contributions | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed) | 5335 | $2,321,093 |
| PACs | 1061 | $1,835,745 |
| Super PACs | 3 | $6,000 |
| Party committees | 2 | $27 |
| Total (committee-sourced) | $4,162,866 |
Money received from committees, split by the type of the paying committee (PAC, Super PAC, party, joint-fundraising, conduit). Individual (person) giving is aggregated separately with privacy suppression and is not included here.
34% by dollars
6872 of 21131 individual contributions on file routed through a conduit, lifetime -- not per-cycle (the underlying edge source can't be cleanly split by year). Conduit dollars are the true donor's money, passed through a platform; not double-counted.
● Individual (direct) 82% · ● Committee-routed (PAC / party / JFA / conduit) 18%
21131 individual contributions to this candidate's principal committee vs 6401 committee-routed contributions across every committee this candidate has authorized ($18,713,996 vs $4,162,866). Two different grains -- individual money is scoped to the principal committee only; committee-routed money spans every authorized committee -- combined here as the closest count-first read of PAC- vs individual-dependence available today. Part of the funding-concentration strip (#2730); donor-sector concentration and top-vendor share are not yet available.
Money disbursed by this candidate's principal committee: contributions to other candidates (the "raises big, then funds allies" signal), transfers to committees by destination type, vendor spending, and independent expenditures made.
Aggregated itemized individual giving, geocoded to donor home address, suppressed for privacy (small or single-donor-dominated cells withheld). Unitemized giving has no geography.
Treasurer · FAGIN, TAMARA
Board / senior staff arrive from the payroll-disbursement derivation.
| Committee | Role | Type |
|---|---|---|
| Anna Eshoo For Congress '88 | Authorized committee | H |
| Anna Eshoo For Congress | Principal campaign committee | H |
Contributing committees & PACs · 2000:
No committee contributions on file for this cycle.
36 of this candidate's 40 top committee funders also fund the other side.
Each committee's overall giving split by recipient party (by dollars).
No independent expenditures on file for 2000 (2016 excluded).
| Vendor | Paid | Payments | Category |
|---|---|---|---|
| Actblue Technical Services | $38,453 | 116 | 001 (Administrative / overhead) |
| Actblue Technical Services | $17,369 | 89 | 001 (Administrative / overhead) |
| Actblue Technical Services | $18,767 | 67 | 001 (Administrative / overhead) |
| Actblue Technical Services | $6,064 | 49 | 001 (Administrative / overhead) |
| Wells Fargo Bank | $2,220 | 41 | 001 (Administrative / overhead) |
| Fiorello Consulting | $86,816 | 31 | 003 (Fundraising & solicitation) |
| Madison Street Press | $488,062 | 26 | 006 (Campaign materials) |
| Wells Fargo Bank | $1,041 | 25 | 001 (Administrative / overhead) |
| Olson, Hagel & Fishburn, Llp | $70,251 | 24 | 001 (Administrative / overhead) |
| Olson Remcho Llp | $102,861 | 24 | 001 (Administrative / overhead) |
| Fiorello Consulting | $80,500 | 23 | 003 (Fundraising & solicitation) |
| Chase Card Services | $76,730 | 22 | 012 (Donations) |
Payment counts from the principal committee; dollar totals held. Arc maps of where money goes arrive with the geo layer.
| Category | Payments |
|---|---|
| 001 (Administrative / overhead) | 771 |
| 003 (Fundraising & solicitation) | 199 |
| 006 (Campaign materials) | 88 |
| 004 (Advertising) | 39 |
| 012 (Donations) | 24 |
| 007 (Campaign events) | 23 |
| 005 (Polling) | 9 |
| 011 (Political contributions) | 5 |
Disbursement categories by payment count; dollar rollups held.
No response on file. The subject of this page may add a statement here.
Is this you? Claim this page to respond. Statements are the subject's own words, verified and moderated — the underlying data is unchanged.
One-stop candidate summary · money-dark until the corrected-financial refresh. Data as of March 11, 2026, 11 a.m..