elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Napolitano, Grace

candidate · H8CA34068
Napolitano, Grace CA · DEM · House · CA-31 · incumbent
The seat — demographics, elections & money for this district full page ↗

Person: Napolitano, Grace · every race, every cycle

15 cycles1 committees0 contributing committees62 vendors

Raised — contributing committees / cycle

Spent — vendor payments / cycle

IE support — independent expenditures for this candidate / cycle

Transferred out — other candidates funded / cycle

All four, combined -- 2016-2028

20162028
Raised Spent IE support Transferred out

2016–2028 · entity counts (money-dark); dollar trends light up at the flip. "Raised" is committee-routed contributions only — individual donors stay held pending the privacy decision, and there is no distinct bundler surface yet (#2488).

In this race

2012

DEM · primary contest (4 filers, order not yet known)

Candidate Status Cash on hand Contributing committees Raised / cycle Spent / cycle IE support / cycle Transferred / cycle
Napolitano, Grace (this candidate) incumbent 127
Aguilar, Pete challenger 602
Kim, Justin Sung-Sup challenger
Wickman, Renea challenger

REP · primary contest (2 filers, order not yet known)

Candidate Status Cash on hand Contributing committees Raised / cycle Spent / cycle IE support / cycle Transferred / cycle
Dutton, Robert Bob challenger
Miller, Gary G incumbent 3

Every candidate on file for this race. A party with more than one filer is a live primary contest -- who becomes that party's nominee isn't in the data yet. Cash on hand is the official FEC filing figure, as of the filing's own coverage date -- not a live estimate. The remaining columns are money-dark proxies (counts, not dollars); a dash means no data on file for that candidate yet. Click a column heading to sort.

Campaign contact

NORWALK, CA, 90650

Website, phone and social accounts arrive with the campaign-contact ingest (FEC F1 + social sources).

Money raised vs spent

coming

Raised-vs-spent over time — the per-cycle totals surface is coming.

Where the money comes from

by source type

PACs 91% · Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed) 9% · Party committees 0%

Source typeContributionsAmount
PACs420$663,450
Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed)286$63,564
Party committees2$27
Total (committee-sourced)$727,041

Money received from committees, split by the type of the paying committee (PAC, Super PAC, party, joint-fundraising, conduit). Individual (person) giving is aggregated separately with privacy suppression and is not included here.

Individual-donor conduit dependency

lifetime

16% by dollars

792 of 4565 individual contributions on file routed through a conduit, lifetime -- not per-cycle (the underlying edge source can't be cleanly split by year). Conduit dollars are the true donor's money, passed through a platform; not double-counted.

PAC vs. individual money

by dollars

Individual (direct) 80% · Committee-routed (PAC / party / JFA / conduit) 20%

4565 individual contributions to this candidate's principal committee vs 708 committee-routed contributions across every committee this candidate has authorized ($2,904,864 vs $727,041). Two different grains -- individual money is scoped to the principal committee only; committee-routed money spans every authorized committee -- combined here as the closest count-first read of PAC- vs individual-dependence available today. Part of the funding-concentration strip (#2730); donor-sector concentration and top-vendor share are not yet available.

Where the money goes

beneficiaries

Money disbursed by this candidate's principal committee: contributions to other candidates (the "raises big, then funds allies" signal), transfers to committees by destination type, vendor spending, and independent expenditures made.

Where the donors are

precinct-floored · suppressed
Partial data. About 15% of donor money is geocoded, concentrated in 9 states (AK, AL, AR, AZ, CO, CT, DC, DE, FL). Every other state — including the largest donor states (CA, NY, TX) — currently has zero geocoded rows. A blank state means not yet geocoded, never no donors here. Not a complete picture of donor geography.
Loading…

Aggregated itemized individual giving, geocoded to donor home address, suppressed for privacy (small or single-donor-dominated cells withheld). Unitemized giving has no geography.

Who runs it

Treasurer · CARDENAS, BENJAMIN

Board / senior staff arrive from the payroll-disbursement derivation.

Committees

authorized
CommitteeRoleType
Napolitano For Congress Principal campaign committee H

Money in

committee & PAC contributions

Contributing committees & PACs · 2012:

No committee contributions on file for this cycle.

Cross-party support

who funds both sides

32 of this candidate's 40 top committee funders also fund the other side.

Committee / PACOverall givingD / R
Honeywell International Political Action Committee 50% / 50%
National Association Of Realtors Political Action Committee 50% / 50%
Otsuka America Pharmaceutical Inc. Political Action Committee (Otsuka Us Pac) 50% / 50%
America'S Credit Unions Pac Of Credit Union National Association, Inc. 51% / 49%
Employees Of Northrop Grumman Corporation Pac 49% / 51%
Sempra Energy Employees Political Action Committee- Federal 49% / 51%
Verizon Communications, Inc. Political Action Committee (Verizon Pac) 49% / 51%
Baker Donelson Bearman Caldwell & Berkowitz Pc Pac 52% / 48%
National Beer Wholesalers Association Political Action Committee 48% / 52%
American Physical Therapy Association Physical Therapy Political Action Committee (Pt-Pac) 53% / 47%
Charter Communications Inc. Political Action Committee 47% / 53%
General Motors Company Political Action Committee (Gm Pac) 53% / 47%

Each committee's overall giving split by recipient party (by dollars).

Super PAC spending

$ held · counts

No independent expenditures on file for 2012 (2016 excluded).

Money out — top vendors

$ shown
VendorPaidPaymentsCategory
Actblue Technical Services $735 48 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Olson Remcho, Llp $39,483 24 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Olson Hagel & Fishburn, Llp $35,498 23 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Olson Remcho, Llp $35,937 22 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Wells Fargo Bank $1,572 21 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Actblue Technical Services $424 18 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Actblue Technical Services $390 16 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Wells Fargo Bank $919 15 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Olson Remcho, Llp $23,533 13 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Chao, Daniel $26,853 11 001 (Administrative / overhead)
Chao, Daniel $25,450 11 003 (Fundraising & solicitation)
Democracy Engine Technical Services $1,465 10 001 (Administrative / overhead)

Payment counts from the principal committee; dollar totals held. Arc maps of where money goes arrive with the geo layer.

Top expenditure categories

$ held
CategoryPayments
001 (Administrative / overhead)309
003 (Fundraising & solicitation)56
004 (Advertising)29
002 (Travel)12
007 (Campaign events)7
006 (Campaign materials)4
012 (Donations)1
011 (Political contributions)1

Disbursement categories by payment count; dollar rollups held.

Right of response

No response on file. The subject of this page may add a statement here.

Is this you? Claim this page to respond. Statements are the subject's own words, verified and moderated — the underlying data is unchanged.

One-stop candidate summary · money-dark until the corrected-financial refresh. Data as of March 11, 2026, 11 a.m..