elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Sherman, Brad

candidate · H6CA24113
Sherman, Brad CA · DEM · House · CA-32 · incumbent
The seat — demographics, elections & money for this district full page ↗

Person: Sherman, Brad · every race, every cycle

16 cycles1 committees138 contributing committees278 vendors

Raised — contributing committees / cycle

Spent — vendor payments / cycle

IE support — independent expenditures for this candidate / cycle

Transferred out — other candidates funded / cycle

All four, combined -- 2016-2028

20162028
Raised Spent IE support Transferred out

2016–2028 · entity counts (money-dark); dollar trends light up at the flip. "Raised" is committee-routed contributions only — individual donors stay held pending the privacy decision, and there is no distinct bundler surface yet (#2488).

Campaign contact

LOS ANGELES, CA, 90017

Website, phone and social accounts arrive with the campaign-contact ingest (FEC F1 + social sources).

Money raised vs spent

coming

Raised-vs-spent over time — the per-cycle totals surface is coming.

Where the money comes from

by source type

PACs 95% · Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed) 4% · Super PACs 1% · Party committees 0%

Source typeContributionsAmount
PACs1461$2,506,557
Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed)2709$115,567
Super PACs10$18,100
Party committees2$81
Total (committee-sourced)$2,640,305

Money received from committees, split by the type of the paying committee (PAC, Super PAC, party, joint-fundraising, conduit). Individual (person) giving is aggregated separately with privacy suppression and is not included here.

Individual-donor conduit dependency

lifetime

8% by dollars

2174 of 25224 individual contributions on file routed through a conduit, lifetime -- not per-cycle (the underlying edge source can't be cleanly split by year). Conduit dollars are the true donor's money, passed through a platform; not double-counted.

PAC vs. individual money

by dollars

Individual (direct) 90% · Committee-routed (PAC / party / JFA / conduit) 10%

25224 individual contributions to this candidate's principal committee vs 4182 committee-routed contributions across every committee this candidate has authorized ($22,766,394 vs $2,640,305). Two different grains -- individual money is scoped to the principal committee only; committee-routed money spans every authorized committee -- combined here as the closest count-first read of PAC- vs individual-dependence available today. Part of the funding-concentration strip (#2730); donor-sector concentration and top-vendor share are not yet available.

Where the money goes

beneficiaries

Money disbursed by this candidate's principal committee: contributions to other candidates (the "raises big, then funds allies" signal), transfers to committees by destination type, vendor spending, and independent expenditures made.

Where the donors are

precinct-floored · suppressed
Partial data. About 15% of donor money is geocoded, concentrated in 9 states (AK, AL, AR, AZ, CO, CT, DC, DE, FL). Every other state — including the largest donor states (CA, NY, TX) — currently has zero geocoded rows. A blank state means not yet geocoded, never no donors here. Not a complete picture of donor geography.
Loading…

Aggregated itemized individual giving, geocoded to donor home address, suppressed for privacy (small or single-donor-dominated cells withheld). Unitemized giving has no geography.

Who runs it

Treasurer · KAUFMAN, STEPHEN J

Board / senior staff arrive from the payroll-disbursement derivation.

Committees

authorized
CommitteeRoleType
Sherman For Congress Principal campaign committee H

Money in

committee & PAC contributions

Contributing committees & PACs · 2026:

No committee contributions on file for this cycle.

Cross-party support

who funds both sides

37 of this candidate's 40 top committee funders also fund the other side.

Committee / PACOverall givingD / R
Fs Pac 50% / 50%
Honeywell International Political Action Committee 50% / 50%
National Association Of Realtors Political Action Committee 50% / 50%
Ubs Americas Inc. Political Action Committee (Ubs Pac) 50% / 50%
America'S Credit Unions Pac Of Credit Union National Association, Inc. 51% / 49%
Employees Of Northrop Grumman Corporation Pac 49% / 51%
Pricewaterhousecoopers Political Action Committee I 49% / 51%
The Vanguard Group Committee For Responsible Government 49% / 51%
Ameriprise Financial Inc. Political Action Committee (Ameriprisepac) 48% / 52%
Deloitte Political Action Committee 48% / 52%
Mortgage Bankers Association Political Action Committee (Morpac) 48% / 52%
Nafcu Pac Of Credit Union National Association, Inc. 48% / 52%

Each committee's overall giving split by recipient party (by dollars).

Super PAC spending

$ held · counts

No independent expenditures on file for 2026 (2016 excluded).

Money out — top vendors

$ shown
VendorPaidPaymentsCategory
Actblue $2,761 79
Actblue $881 77
Actblue $1,696 68
Actblue $902 55
Tko Public Affairs $108,039 49
Kaufman Legal Group $72,127 48
Kaufman Legal Group $65,597 46
Kaufman Legal Group $62,250 43
First Bank Merchant Service Fee $7,256 43
Democracy Engine, Llc $9,680 42
First Bank Merchant Service $12,773 41
Citi Cards $58,032 41

Payment counts from the principal committee; dollar totals held. Arc maps of where money goes arrive with the geo layer.

Top expenditure categories

$ held
CategoryPayments
001 (Administrative / overhead)2

Disbursement categories by payment count; dollar rollups held.

Right of response

No response on file. The subject of this page may add a statement here.

Is this you? Claim this page to respond. Statements are the subject's own words, verified and moderated — the underlying data is unchanged.

One-stop candidate summary · money-dark until the corrected-financial refresh. Data as of March 11, 2026, 11 a.m..