elect.info
DATA COVERAGE not externally verified tier raw_mirror vintage 2026-08-27 coverage 1980-2024 · 2026 Midterms in flight! money live · figures computing (best estimates)
Dollar figures are still computing and reflect best estimates while the corrected-financial reconciliation completes. Relationships, counts, and dates are final.

Buck, Kenneth R

candidate · S0CO00237
Buck, Kenneth R CO · REP · Senate · CO · challenger
The seat — demographics, elections & money for this district full page ↗

Person: Buck, Kenneth R · every race, every cycle

4 cycles3 committees1 contributing committees0 vendors

Raised — contributing committees / cycle

Spent — vendor payments / cycle

IE support — independent expenditures for this candidate / cycle

Transferred out — other candidates funded / cycle

All four, combined -- 2016-2028

20162028
Raised Spent IE support Transferred out

2016–2028 · entity counts (money-dark); dollar trends light up at the flip. "Raised" is committee-routed contributions only — individual donors stay held pending the privacy decision, and there is no distinct bundler surface yet (#2488).

In this race

2016

DEM

Candidate Status Cash on hand Contributing committees Raised / cycle Spent / cycle IE support / cycle Transferred / cycle
Bennet, Michael F. incumbent 252

REP · primary contest (10 filers, order not yet known)

Candidate Status Cash on hand Contributing committees Raised / cycle Spent / cycle IE support / cycle Transferred / cycle
Buck, Kenneth R (this candidate) challenger 18
Blaha, Robert challenger 1
Frazier, Ryan Lavar challenger
Glenn, Darryl challenger 7
Graham, John Collins challenger
Keyser, Jon challenger
Littleton, Peg Lorraine challenger
Natividad, Jerry challenger
Neville, Timothy Patrick challenger
Rosier, Donald Preston II challenger

GRE

Candidate Status Cash on hand Contributing committees Raised / cycle Spent / cycle IE support / cycle Transferred / cycle
Menconi, Arnold Michael challenger

LIB

Candidate Status Cash on hand Contributing committees Raised / cycle Spent / cycle IE support / cycle Transferred / cycle
Williams, Lily Tang challenger

Every candidate on file for this race. A party with more than one filer is a live primary contest -- who becomes that party's nominee isn't in the data yet. Cash on hand is the official FEC filing figure, as of the filing's own coverage date -- not a live estimate. The remaining columns are money-dark proxies (counts, not dollars); a dash means no data on file for that candidate yet. Click a column heading to sort.

In the 2016 Senate field

CO

473 Senate candidates nationally in 2016.

#CandidateStatePartyRaised
1 Fetterman, John Karl PA DEM $60,730,598
2 Cortez Masto, Catherine NV DEM $59,540,356
3 Hassan, Margaret Wood NH DEM $35,587,066
4 Bennet, Michael F. CO DEM $17,127,591
5 Duckworth, L. Tammy IL DEM $14,884,078
6 Schumer, Charles E. NY DEM $13,811,846
7 Murray, Patty WA DEM $12,048,061
8 Harris, Kamala D CA DEM $11,824,890

The national Senate field for 2016, ranked by money raised. Party affiliation shown as filed — third-party and state-party labels (DFL, WFP, etc.) are not merged into DEM/REP. This candidate did not appear in the returned set.

Campaign contact

GREELEY, CO, 80633

Website, phone and social accounts arrive with the campaign-contact ingest (FEC F1 + social sources).

Money raised vs spent

coming

Raised-vs-spent over time — the per-cycle totals surface is coming.

Where the money comes from

by source type

PACs 100%

Source typeContributionsAmount
PACs63$79,600
Total (committee-sourced)$79,600

Money received from committees, split by the type of the paying committee (PAC, Super PAC, party, joint-fundraising, conduit). Individual (person) giving is aggregated separately with privacy suppression and is not included here.

Individual-donor conduit dependency

lifetime

8% by dollars

1016 of 9608 individual contributions on file routed through a conduit, lifetime -- not per-cycle (the underlying edge source can't be cleanly split by year). Conduit dollars are the true donor's money, passed through a platform; not double-counted.

PAC vs. individual money

by dollars

Individual (direct) 99% · Committee-routed (PAC / party / JFA / conduit) 1%

9608 individual contributions to this candidate's principal committee vs 63 committee-routed contributions across every committee this candidate has authorized ($7,639,984 vs $79,600). Two different grains -- individual money is scoped to the principal committee only; committee-routed money spans every authorized committee -- combined here as the closest count-first read of PAC- vs individual-dependence available today. Part of the funding-concentration strip (#2730); donor-sector concentration and top-vendor share are not yet available.

Where the donors are

precinct-floored · suppressed
Partial data. About 15% of donor money is geocoded, concentrated in 9 states (AK, AL, AR, AZ, CO, CT, DC, DE, FL). Every other state — including the largest donor states (CA, NY, TX) — currently has zero geocoded rows. A blank state means not yet geocoded, never no donors here. Not a complete picture of donor geography.
Loading…

Aggregated itemized individual giving, geocoded to donor home address, suppressed for privacy (small or single-donor-dominated cells withheld). Unitemized giving has no geography.

Who runs it

Treasurer · KLEIN, CHERYL MS.

Board / senior staff arrive from the payroll-disbursement derivation.

Committees

authorized
CommitteeRoleType
Buck For Colorado Principal campaign committee H
Buck Colorado Victory Committee Joint fundraising N
Buck Victory Committee Joint fundraising N

Money in

committee & PAC contributions

Contributing committees & PACs · 2016:

No committee contributions on file for this cycle.

Cross-party support

who funds both sides

15 of this candidate's 18 top committee funders also fund the other side.

Committee / PACOverall givingD / R
Echostar Corporation And Dish Network Corporation Pac (Echostar Dish Network Pac) 50% / 50%
Maxar Technologies Inc. Pac (Maxarpac) 50% / 50%
Ernst & Young Political Action Committee 46% / 54%
Michigan Sugar Company Growers Political Action Committee 46% / 54%
At&T Inc. Employee Federal Political Action Committee (At&T Employee Federal Pac) 45% / 55%
Wine And Spirits Wholesalers Of America, Inc. Political Action Committee 45% / 55%
National Association Of Benefits And Insurance Professionals Pac (Nabip Pac) 44% / 56%
Lockheed Martin Corporation Employees' Political Action Committee 43% / 57%
Ford Motor Company Civic Action Fund 41% / 59%
Delta Air Lines Pac 39% / 61%
National Air Traffic Controllers Association Pac 64% / 36%
National Telecommunications Cooperative Association Rural Broadband Pac 35% / 65%

Each committee's overall giving split by recipient party (by dollars).

Super PAC spending

$ held · counts

No independent expenditures on file for 2016 (2016 excluded).

Money out — top vendors

$ shown

No vendor disbursements on file.

Right of response

No response on file. The subject of this page may add a statement here.

Is this you? Claim this page to respond. Statements are the subject's own words, verified and moderated — the underlying data is unchanged.

One-stop candidate summary · money-dark until the corrected-financial refresh. Data as of March 11, 2026, 11 a.m..