Person: Rubio, Marco · every race, every cycle
Raised — contributing committees / cycle
Spent — vendor payments / cycle
IE support — independent expenditures for this candidate / cycle
Transferred out — other candidates funded / cycle
All four, combined -- 2016-2028
2016–2028 · entity counts (money-dark); dollar trends light up at the flip. "Raised" is committee-routed contributions only — individual donors stay held pending the privacy decision, and there is no distinct bundler surface yet (#2488).
REP · primary contest (2 filers, order not yet known)
| Candidate | Status | Cash on hand | Contributing committees | Raised / cycle | Spent / cycle | IE support / cycle | Transferred / cycle |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rubio, Marco (this candidate) | incumbent | — | 540 | ||||
| Skrbic, Ljubo Dr | challenger | — | — |
Every candidate on file for this race. A party with more than one filer is a live primary contest -- who becomes that party's nominee isn't in the data yet. Cash on hand is the official FEC filing figure, as of the filing's own coverage date -- not a live estimate. The remaining columns are money-dark proxies (counts, not dollars); a dash means no data on file for that candidate yet. Click a column heading to sort.
558 Senate candidates nationally in 2020.
| # | Candidate | State | Party | Raised |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Warnock, Raphael | GA | DEM | $215,222,453 |
| 2 | Ossoff, T. Jonathan | GA | DEM | $214,842,226 |
| 3 | Kelly, Mark | AZ | DEM | $187,045,474 |
| 4 | Harrison, Jaime | SC | DEM | $119,916,011 |
| 5 | Sullivan, Dan | AK | REP | $109,507,676 |
| 6 | McGrath, Amy | KY | DEM | $81,476,987 |
| 7 | Gideon, Sara | ME | DEM | $58,099,579 |
| 8 | Graham, Lindsey O. | SC | REP | $55,788,928 |
The national Senate field for 2020, ranked by money raised. Party affiliation shown as filed — third-party and state-party labels (DFL, WFP, etc.) are not merged into DEM/REP. This candidate did not appear in the returned set.
MIAMI, FL, 33266
Website, phone and social accounts arrive with the campaign-contact ingest (FEC F1 + social sources).
Raised-vs-spent over time — the per-cycle totals surface is coming.
● PACs 68% · ● Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed) 29% · ● Party committees 1% · ● Super PACs 1%
| Source type | Contributions | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| PACs | 1656 | $2,806,808 |
| Conduits (ActBlue / WinRed) | 45402 | $1,201,460 |
| Party committees | 3 | $56,200 |
| Super PACs | 16 | $38,333 |
| Total (committee-sourced) | $4,102,801 |
Money received from committees, split by the type of the paying committee (PAC, Super PAC, party, joint-fundraising, conduit). Individual (person) giving is aggregated separately with privacy suppression and is not included here.
| Payer type | Transfers | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| Joint-fundraising committees | 81 | $1,943,609 |
| Total | $1,943,609 |
Committee-to-committee transfers received by this candidate's principal committee, split by the type of the sending committee.
20% by dollars
772178 of 1162695 individual contributions on file routed through a conduit, lifetime -- not per-cycle (the underlying edge source can't be cleanly split by year). Conduit dollars are the true donor's money, passed through a platform; not double-counted.
● Individual (direct) 98% · ● Committee-routed (PAC / party / JFA / conduit) 2%
1162695 individual contributions to this candidate's principal committee vs 47077 committee-routed contributions across every committee this candidate has authorized ($194,529,315 vs $4,102,801). Two different grains -- individual money is scoped to the principal committee only; committee-routed money spans every authorized committee -- combined here as the closest count-first read of PAC- vs individual-dependence available today. Part of the funding-concentration strip (#2730); donor-sector concentration and top-vendor share are not yet available.
Money disbursed by this candidate's principal committee: contributions to other candidates (the "raises big, then funds allies" signal), transfers to committees by destination type, vendor spending, and independent expenditures made.
Aggregated itemized individual giving, geocoded to donor home address, suppressed for privacy (small or single-donor-dominated cells withheld). Unitemized giving has no geography.
Treasurer · LISKER, LISA
Board / senior staff arrive from the payroll-disbursement derivation.
| Committee | Role | Type |
|---|---|---|
| Florida Victory Committee | Joint fundraising | N |
| Founders Committee; The | Joint fundraising | S |
| Founders Joint Candidate Committee | Joint fundraising | N |
| Friends Of Demint & Rubio | Joint fundraising | S |
| Legacy Victory Fund | Joint fundraising | N |
| Rubio/Reclaim America Joint Committee | Joint fundraising | N |
| Rubio Rivera 2010 | Joint fundraising | N |
| Rubio Victory Committee | Joint fundraising | N |
| Rubio Victory Committee | Joint fundraising | N |
| Save Our Senate Committee | Joint fundraising | S |
| Marco Rubio For Senate | Principal campaign committee | S |
Contributing committees & PACs · 2020:
Committee & PAC contributions to this candidate. Individual donors remain held (donor-privacy decision).
100% of committee-routed contributions to this candidate (2020) arrive through conduit infrastructure — 45,402 of 45,522 contributions · 79% of dollars ($1,201,460).
| Conduit | Amount |
|---|---|
| WinRed | $1,201,460 |
Conduits (ActBlue, WinRed) are passthroughs — individuals give through them to candidates. This is the share of committee-routed contributions flowing over that infrastructure. Donor-level pass-through to the ultimate recipient is tracked separately (in progress).
34 of this candidate's 40 top committee funders also fund the other side.
| Committee / PAC | Overall giving | D / R |
|---|---|---|
| Medtronic Inc. Pac | 50% / 50% | |
| America'S Credit Unions Pac Of Credit Union National Association, Inc. | 51% / 49% | |
| Employees Of Northrop Grumman Corporation Pac | 49% / 51% | |
| L3Harris Technologies, Inc. Pac | 51% / 49% | |
| Peraton Corp. Political Action Committee (A.K.A. 'Peraton Pac') | 49% / 51% | |
| T-Mobile Us, Inc. Political Action Committee (T-Pac) | 51% / 49% | |
| Ctia - The Wireless Association Political Action Committee | 48% / 52% | |
| Samsung Electronics America Inc Political Action Committee | 52% / 48% | |
| Molina Healthcare, Inc. Pac | 47% / 53% | |
| American Airlines Inc. Political Action Committee (Aapac) | 46% / 54% | |
| Toyota Motor North America, Inc Political Action Committee (Toyota/Lexus Pac) | 46% / 54% | |
| Waste Management Employees Better Government Fund | 54% / 46% |
Each committee's overall giving split by recipient party (by dollars).
Supporting: 0 committees · 0 expenditures · — · Opposing: 1 · 3 · $7,698
| Committee | Stance | Amount |
|---|---|---|
| The Lincoln Project | opposes | $7,698 |
Independent expenditures for or against this candidate. 2016 excluded (known IE undercount).
0% of this candidate's receipts + outside spending is outside money (independent expenditures for/against, as a share of receipts plus outside spending).
| Vendor | Paid | Payments | Category |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bb&T Financial | $315,840 | 104 | |
| Adp | $14,600 | 103 | |
| U.S. Postal Service | $225,365 | 100 | |
| Anedot | $54,003 | 69 | |
| Bb&T Financial | $106,360 | 64 | |
| Cmdi | $1,337,927 | 63 | |
| Gruda, Matthew | $149,907 | 52 | |
| Gregory, Elizabeth | $127,775 | 51 | |
| Planet Direct Mail | $1,088,109 | 47 | |
| Insperity | $451,139 | 46 | |
| Rst Marketing | $1,397,992 | 46 | |
| Morgan, Mark | $210,552 | 43 |
Payment counts from the principal committee; dollar totals held. Arc maps of where money goes arrive with the geo layer.
No response on file. The subject of this page may add a statement here.
Is this you? Claim this page to respond. Statements are the subject's own words, verified and moderated — the underlying data is unchanged.
One-stop candidate summary · money-dark until the corrected-financial refresh. Data as of March 11, 2026, 11 a.m..